刑法解释基本立场之检视

发布时间：2018-05-18 05:56

本文选题：刑法解释 + 立场　；参考：《现代法学》2015年01期

【摘要】：刑法解释的立场指导着刑法解释的方向,是刑法解释的最基本问题。客观主义解释主张从"法的本意"来解释刑法,而主观主义立场主张从"立法者原意"来解释刑法。因此"法的本意"的来源、存在基础以及其解释效果是应当为各界所关注的。从认知规律看,立法者的立法过程和解释者的解释过程都离不开理性的认识,在质疑"立法者原意"理性的同时,也不能忽视解释者对于"法的本意"探讨的理性。从表意学角度出发,解读立法者的原意、立法者的表意和法律文本的文义之间的关系,立法者的原意是三者中核心和本质的部分,是表达的出发点和依据。在刑法解释过程中,解释对象和解释者之间的融合是解释的一种必然现象,但这绝不是解释的一种应然方法。从某种意义上讲,正是这种现象的存在才要采取一定的方法来制约。在摒弃"立法者原意"的情况下,客观主义解释的立场是主观化的,而主观主义解释的立场是客观化的。所以,在刑法解释中应该遵循主观主义解释立场。
[Abstract]:The position of the interpretation of criminal law guides the direction of the interpretation of criminal law and is the most basic problem in the interpretation of criminal law. Objectivist interpretation advocates to interpret criminal law from "the original intention of law", while subjectivism stands for interpreting criminal law from "legislator's original intention". Therefore, the origin, existence basis and interpretation effect of the original meaning of law should be paid attention to by all walks of life. From the perspective of cognitive law, the legislator's legislative process and the interpreter's interpretation process can not be separated from the rational understanding. While questioning the rationality of the "legislator's original intention", we should not ignore the reason that the interpreter probes into "the original intention of the law". From the perspective of ideographic theory, this paper interprets the original meaning of the legislator, the relationship between the legislator's ideographic meaning and the textual meaning of the legal text. The original intention of the legislator is the core and essential part of the three parts, which is the starting point and the basis of the expression. In the process of criminal law interpretation, the fusion between the object of interpretation and the interpreter is an inevitable phenomenon of interpretation, but it is by no means an appropriate method of interpretation. In a sense, it is the existence of this phenomenon to take certain methods to restrict. In the case of abandoning "legislator's original intention", the position of objectivism interpretation is subjective, while that of subjectivism interpretation is objective. Therefore, the interpretation of criminal law should follow the position of subjectivism.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】