污染环境罪实证研究——以中国裁判文书网198份污染环境罪裁判文书为样本

发布时间：2018-05-27 05:40

本文选题：污染环境罪 + 实证研究　；参考：《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年04期

【摘要】：随着《刑法修正案(八)》的生效和相关司法解释的出台,污染环境刑事案件数量迅速增长。该罪多由两人以上实施,而法院对该罪是否存在共同犯罪有争议;污染环境罪最为常见的行为类型是非法排放、倾倒生产废水,且大量构成犯罪的生产经营活动缺乏工商、环保等部门的有效监管。司法审判中,存在鉴定机构多头混乱、鉴定程序不规范等问题,需要建立与完善环境损害鉴定制度;对该罪主观方面的争议也需要厘清;对"严重污染环境"认定标准的具体适用还需要进一步明确。在刑罚设置上,需要对自由刑的幅度进行一定程度的扩张,罚金的适用也应划分幅度,由法官根据具体情况在相应幅度内进行自由裁量。
[Abstract]:With the entry into force of the Criminal Law Amendment (8) and the introduction of related judicial interpretations, the number of criminal cases of environmental pollution has increased rapidly. Most of the crimes were committed by more than two people, and the court disputed the existence of a joint crime. The most common types of behavior of environmental pollution crimes are illegal discharge, dumping of production wastewater, and the lack of industry and commerce in a large number of production and business activities that constitute the crime. Effective supervision of environmental protection departments. In the judicial trial, there are many problems, such as confusion of appraisal organization, nonstandard appraisal procedure and so on, so it is necessary to establish and perfect the appraisal system of environmental damage, and to clarify the dispute on the subjective aspect of the crime. The concrete application of the standard of "serious pollution environment" needs to be further clarified. In penalty setting, it is necessary to expand the range of free punishment to a certain extent, and the application of fine should also be divided into ranges, according to the specific circumstances, the judge should exercise discretion within the corresponding range.
【作者单位】：河海大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(09AZD048)
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】