非法经营罪的扩张问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 14:13

  本文选题：非法经营罪 + 兜底条款　； 参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：非法经营罪是1997年刑法在分解1979年刑法中的投机倒把罪的基础上形成的新罪名，也是刑法修订后变动最多的罪名。在过去的17年中，全国人大及其常委会、最高人民法院、最高人民检察院相继出台了一系列涉及非法经营罪的立法规定、司法解释，司法实践中以非法经营罪第4款规定定罪量刑的案件更是与日俱增，这就使得非法经营罪成为一种新的“口袋罪”。在罪刑法定原则已经被明确规定在刑法中的时代，任何违反该原则的刑事立法与司法都应当尽力避免。因此，如何正确理解非法经营罪的扩张现象，防止其不合理扩张趋势继续加剧，是当前立法者、司法者以及学者们应当共同关注的课题。 本文在理论结合实践的基础上对非法经营罪进行了以下研究，着重阐述了非法经营罪的扩张问题，全文共分为五个章节： 在第一章，，文章首先介绍了我国非法经营罪的立法沿革，指出我国现行的非法经营罪是从旧刑法的投机倒把罪分解出来的；同时为了对非法经营罪有一个全面、准确的把握，本文还对非法经营罪的概念、立法特征以及犯罪构成要件进行了简要的介绍。 在第二章，本文解释了非法经营罪扩张的含义以及其在立法层面、司法解释层面以及司法实践中的扩张表现，同时根据不同的标准，将非法经营罪的扩张类型分为三种：一是根据非法经营罪扩张的主体不同，将其分为立法机关的扩张以及司法机关的扩张。二是根据非法经营罪扩张的对象不同，将其对象分为特定物品以及普通物品。三是根据非法经营罪扩张的内容不同，将其分为经营主体资格违法的扩张、经营内容违法的扩张以及经营行为方式违法的扩张。 在第三章，通过梳理非法经营罪设立之后，最高立法机关出台的补充规定、最高司法机关颁布的司法解释以及地方司法机关在司法实践中的一些判例，从是否符合罪刑法定原则的角度进行相应的评价，将非法经营罪的扩张分为合理的扩张以及不合理的扩张，从而为我们正确认识非法经营罪的扩张问题提供一个客观全面的借鉴。 在第四章，分析了我国非法经营罪过度扩张的原因，并指出了非法经营罪无限扩张的危害性。非法经营罪过度扩张主要有以下原因：非法经营罪的立法局限性、中国经济发展的实际状况以及中国传统价值观的影响。非法经营罪过度扩张的危害性主要表现在：不符合刑法罪刑法定原则中立法明确性的要求、违背了刑法谦抑的精神以及可能侵犯个人的合法权利。 在第五章，针对我国非法经营罪扩张的失控状态及其危害，提出了限制非法经营罪过度扩张的建议：限制非法经营罪的立法扩张。进一步明确“国家规定”的内涵，完善兜底条款的描述方式，合理进行非法经营罪的立法解释；限制非法经营罪的司法解释扩张。合理进行司法解释，在司法解释中设立有关溯及力的特别条款；限制非法经营罪的司法实践扩张。坚持罪刑法定原则，正当地行使自由裁量权。
[Abstract]:The crime of illegal operation is a new crime on the basis of the crime of speculation in the criminal law of 1979 in 1997. It is also the crime that has changed most after the revision of the criminal law. In the past 17 years, the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee, the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have set out a series of legislative provisions involving the crime of illegal operation. Judicial interpretation, in judicial practice, the fourth provisions of the crime of illegal operation are increasing, which makes the crime of illegal operation a new "bag of mouth". In the age of the principle of legality in criminal law, any criminal legislation and judicature that violates the principle should be avoided. How to correctly understand the expansion of the crime of illegal management and to prevent the increasing trend of its irrational expansion are the topics that the current legislator, the judiciary and the scholars should pay attention to.
This paper studies the crime of illegal operation on the basis of theory and practice, and focuses on the expansion of the crime of illegal operation. The full text is divided into five chapters.
In the first chapter, the article first introduces the legislative evolution of the crime of illegal operation in our country, and points out that the current crime of illegal operation in our country is decomposed from the crime of speculation in the old criminal law. In order to have a comprehensive and accurate grasp of the crime of illegal operation, the concept of the crime of illegal operation, the legislative characteristics and the constitutive requirements of the crime are also carried out in this article. A brief introduction.
In the second chapter, this article explains the meaning of the expansion of the crime of illegal operation and its expansion in the legislative, judicial interpretation and judicial practice. At the same time, according to the different standards, it divides the expansion types of the crime of illegal operation into three types: first, it is divided into the expansion of the legislature according to the expansion of the illegal operation crime. And the expansion of the judicial organs. Two, according to the different objects of the expansion of the crime of illegal operation, the object is divided into specific items and ordinary goods. Three is the expansion of illegal business crime, which is divided into the expansion of illegal business qualification, the expansion of illegal business content and the expansion of illegal operation.
In the third chapter, after combing the establishment of the crime of illegal operation, the supplementary provisions issued by the supreme legislative organ, the judicial interpretation issued by the supreme judicial organ and some cases of the local judicial organs in the judicial practice are evaluated from the point of view of the principle of legality, and the expansion of the crime of illegal operation is divided into reasonable expansion. Zhang and unreasonable expansion provide an objective and comprehensive reference for us to correctly understand the expansion of the crime of illegal business operation.
In the fourth chapter, the reasons for the excessive expansion of the crime of illegal operation in China are analyzed, and the harmfulness of the unlimited expansion of the crime of illegal operation is pointed out. The main reasons are the following reasons: the legislative limitation of the crime of illegal operation, the actual situation of China's economic development and the influence of the traditional Chinese values. The main harm is that it does not conform to the requirement of the neutrality of the criminal law and criminal law, which violates the spirit of the modesty of the criminal law and may infringe on the legitimate rights of the individual.
In the fifth chapter, in view of the uncontrolled state and its harm of the expansion of illegal operation crime in China, it puts forward some suggestions on restricting the excessive expansion of the crime of illegal operation: restricting the legislative expansion of the crime of illegal operation, further clarifying the connotation of the "state regulations", perfecting the description of the provisions of the bottom of the pocket, explaining the legislative interpretation of the crime of illegal operation and restricting the illegal operation of the crime. The judicial interpretation of the business crime is expanded, the judicial interpretation is rationally carried out, the special provisions relating to the retroactive force are set up in the judicial interpretation, the judicial practice of the crime of illegal operation is expanded, the principle of legality is persisted, and the right of discretion is exercised properly.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前2条

1 胡敏,曹坚;论非法经营罪堵漏条款的合理认定[J];华东政法学院学报;2003年05期

2 刘树德;罪刑法定原则中空白罪状的追问[J];法学研究;2001年02期

本文编号：1951169