集资诈骗罪的认定问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 17:52

本文选题：集资诈骗罪 + 非法集资　；参考：《河南师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着市场经济的发展,金融市场的繁荣与企业融资困难的矛盾加剧,民间融资有了盛行空间,后滋生了诸如非法吸收公众存款、集资诈骗等犯罪行为,尤其是集资诈骗犯罪活动愈演愈烈,不仅严重危害我国的金融管理秩序,更对集资群众财产造成巨大损失,极易引发群体事件,造成了诸多社会不稳定因素。诸多个案引起了媒体和社会各界的广泛关注,受当前经济形势等因素影响,今后一段时期内,集资诈骗犯罪的案件仍将持续高位运行,并可能集中爆发。浙江吴英案等一系列社会影响较大的集资诈骗案爆发之后,社会各界加大了对于集资诈骗罪的关注和研究,尤其是关于集资诈骗罪的死刑是否废除的争议一直不休,直至《刑法修正案(九)》废除该罪的死刑,才尘埃落定。论文将从集资诈骗罪的犯罪构成各个方面入手,对诸多重点、难点问题如何认定逐一分析,以求对实践中准确认定本罪提供实质性帮助。论文内容主要分四个部分,分别研究了以下几个问题:第一部分通过对集资诈骗罪的现状及现实危害入手,描述目前社会上集资诈骗罪的实际现状,以及对国家金融管理秩序、公私财产所有权、社会稳定造成的危害,以凸显对本罪研究的意义。第二部分从集资诈骗罪的犯罪构成特征分析,具体分析司法实践中如何根据犯罪构成要件来认定集资诈骗罪。分别研究了本罪所侵犯的的客体;客观方面主要研究了对“诈骗方法”、“非法集资”、“不特定公众”及犯罪数额如何认定;主体方面着重对单位犯罪主体中的金融机构、单位的分支或内设机构、一人有限公司等能否成为本罪犯罪主体进行分析;主观方面重点研究认定“非法占有目的”过程中推定的运用及行为表现分析。第三部分进一步对集资诈骗罪的相关行为界限进行分析,分别研究了集资诈骗罪与合法集资、民间借贷等非罪之间的界限,以及集资诈骗罪与非法吸收公众存款罪、合同诈骗罪等彼罪之间的的界限,对正确认定集资诈骗罪起到一定帮助作用。最后一部分对集资诈骗罪的罪数形态如何认定进行探析,分别研究了集资诈骗罪一罪的法条竞合、想象竞合犯、牵连犯、连续犯等形态,尤其对司法实践中存在的集资诈骗犯的牵连犯几种特殊情形着重分析;并从非法占有目的成立时间及各个犯罪成立时间不同对集资诈骗罪的数罪认定进行分析。对集资诈骗罪的罪数进行研究,对于司法机关在实践中对被告人定罪进而量刑关系重大,以争取能够做到不枉不纵。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the market economy, the contradiction between the prosperity of the financial market and the financing difficulties of enterprises has intensified, and there is room for private financing to prevail, and criminal acts such as illegal absorption of public deposits, fund-raising fraud, etc. Especially, the crime of financing fraud is becoming more and more serious, which not only seriously endangers the order of financial management in our country, but also causes huge losses to the property of the people who raise funds, which easily leads to group events and causes many social instability factors. Many cases have aroused the widespread concern of the media and all walks of life, affected by the current economic situation and other factors, in the future, the case of fund-raising fraud will continue to run high, and may erupt in concentration. After the outbreak of a series of large-scale fund-raising fraud cases such as the Wuying case in Zhejiang Province, various sectors of society have increased their attention and research on the crime of fund-raising fraud, especially the controversy over whether the death penalty should be abolished for the crime of fund-raising fraud. It was not until the Criminal Law Amendment (9) abolished the death penalty for this crime that the dust was settled. This paper will start from the various aspects of the crime of financing fraud, and analyze many key points and difficult problems one by one, in order to provide substantive help for the accurate identification of this crime in practice. The content of this paper is divided into four parts. The following problems are studied: the first part describes the actual situation of the crime of fund-raising fraud and the order of national financial management through the analysis of the current situation and the actual harm of the crime of fraud through raising funds. Public-private property ownership, social stability, in order to highlight the significance of the study of this crime. The second part analyzes the characteristics of the crime constitution of the crime of fund-raising fraud, and analyzes how to identify the crime of financing fraud according to the elements of crime in the judicial practice. The object of the crime is studied separately; the objective aspect mainly studies the methods of fraud, the illegal raising of funds, the determination of the amount of crime and the determination of the amount of the crime; the main body focuses on the financial institutions in the subject of unit crime, Whether the branch or the internal organization of the unit or the limited company of one person can be the subject of this crime is analyzed. The subjective aspect focuses on the application of presumption and the analysis of behavior performance in the process of determining "the purpose of illegal possession". The third part further analyzes the relevant behavior boundaries of the crime of fraud of raising funds, and studies the boundary between the crime of fraud of raising funds and the non-crime of raising funds legally, private borrowing and so on, as well as the crime of fraud of raising funds and the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. The boundary between the crime of contract fraud and so on, plays a certain role in correctly identifying the crime of financing fraud. In the last part of the paper, the author analyzes how to determine the crime number of the crime of fraud of raising funds, and studies the forms of the crime of fraud of raising funds, such as the concurrence of the law, the imagination of the joint crime, the implicated crime, the continuous crime, and so on. Especially in the judicial practice of the existence of several special cases of alleged fraud of funds, and from the illegal possession of the purpose of the establishment of time and different time of the establishment of the crime of financing fraud to determine the crime of a number of crimes. The study on the number of the crime of raising funds for fraud is of great importance to the judicial organs in the practice of conviction and sentencing of the defendant, in order to be able to achieve the right.
【学位授予单位】：河南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】