论贪污罪、受贿罪没收财产刑的废除及其出路

发布时间：2018-06-09 15:50

本文选题：贪污罪 + 受贿罪　；参考：《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：随着刑法保障人权的不断发展,贪污罪、受贿罪的没收财产刑出现诸多不合时宜的弊端,不仅有违背宪法比例原则和刑法罪责自负原则的嫌疑,难达特殊预防之刑罚目的,也与刑罚轻缓化趋势相背,甚至是财产刑执行的桎梏和国际司法协助请求被拒的主要原因。无论是从没收财产刑主废论的保障机能出发,还是从其主存论的刑法保护机能来看,抑或是从贪污罪、受贿罪犯罪主体合法财产难以清晰界定或其灰色财产处置异化的规制怪圈考虑,贪污罪、受贿罪的没收财产刑都应当退出其刑罚的历史舞台。与之相应的是,转变对没收财产刑的传统认识,引入异曲同工且较少负效应的等值没收制度,建立日额罚金制和罚金刑易科制的经济制裁手段,建构综合治理贪污贿赂犯罪的多元化机制,方为依法反腐、依法治腐、依法防腐的根本出路。
[Abstract]:As the criminal law guarantees the continuous development of human rights, the crime of confiscation of the crime of corruption and the confiscation of property in the crime of accepting bribes has appeared in many untimely drawbacks, not only against the suspicion of violation of the principle of constitutional proportion and the principle of the self burden of criminal responsibility, but also to the purpose of the penalty for special prevention, and to the back of the trend of the reprieve of punishment, and even the shackles of the execution of property punishment and the international judicature. The main reasons for the refusal to assist the request, whether from the guarantee function of the discarded theory of the confiscated property, or from the criminal law protection function of the main existence theory, or from the crime of embezzlement, the legal property of the subject of the crime of bribery and the dissimilation of the dissimilation of the grey property disposal, the confiscation of the crime of corruption and the crime of accepting bribes. The production penalty should all be withdrawn from the historical stage of its penalty, and it should change the traditional understanding of the confiscation of property punishment, introduce the equal value confiscation system with the same work and less negative effect, establish the economic sanction means of the daily penalty system and the fine penalty system, and construct a diversified mechanism to comprehensively govern the crime of corruption and bribery. Corruption is the fundamental way to prevent corruption according to law and to protect against corruption according to law.
【作者单位】：浙江师范大学法政学院;开封市公安局土柏岗分局;
【分类号】：DF636

【相似文献】