利益法学立场下刑法目的解释的适用

发布时间：2018-06-10 20:27

本文选题：利益法学 + 目的解释　；参考：《法学论坛》2017年02期

【摘要】：面对刑法规范供给的不足,刑法解释需要重视利益分析及其基础上的目的解释方法。刑法解释不是认知教义学上的理解,而是表达意义上的论证,利益法学与目的解释之间具有学术上的内在关联,后者是前者在解释论上的延伸。目的解释的内在危险不在目的解释本身,而在解释者解释的过程缺乏利益判断的类型化思维。利益法学立场下的刑法目的解释适用需要妥善处理案件事实对刑法规范的型构意义,目的解释与国民预测可能性的关系以及利益类型化的判断。强调利益分析接受构成要件类型化的限定,是目的解释应当坚持的基本准则。
[Abstract]:In the face of the shortage of the standard supply of criminal law, the interpretation of criminal law needs to attach importance to the analysis of interests and the method of purpose interpretation on the basis of it. The interpretation of criminal law is not an understanding of cognitive dogma, but an argument in the sense of expression. There is an academic relationship between interest jurisprudence and teleological interpretation, while the latter is an extension of the former in the theory of interpretation. The inherent danger of teleological interpretation is not the explanation of purpose itself, but the lack of type thinking of interest judgment in the process of interpretation by the interpreter. From the standpoint of interest jurisprudence, the application of criminal law purpose interpretation needs to properly deal with the type meaning of case facts to criminal law norms, the relationship between purpose interpretation and the possibility of national prediction, and the judgment of interest classification. It is the basic criterion of the purpose explanation to emphasize the limitation of the classification of the constitutive elements in the analysis of interests.
【作者单位】：南昌大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“刑法社会化研究”(11BFX109)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】