行为无价值与结果无价值的关系

发布时间：2018-06-11 10:32

本文选题：违法性论 + 行为无价值　；参考：《政治与法律》2015年01期

【摘要】：按照行为无价值二元论的立场,违法性的本质是违反行为规范;同时,侵害法益性也是违法性判断的根据之一。在造成法益侵害或危险,但没有行为的规范违反性时不能确定处罚;在违反规范但并未造成法益侵害时,被告人也无罪。无论从违法性论发展史的角度,还是结合刑法立法和司法实务都可以看出,就违法性判断而言,仅有结果无价值是不够的。如果把仅有法益侵害但没有规范违反的行为也评价为不法,势必会扩大处罚范围。结合侵害犯和危险犯的结果或危险与行为之间的关联性进行分析,就可以发现结果无价值能够融入到行为无价值二元论中,从而取得自己的地位,行为无价值二元论内部没有内在矛盾。行为无价值论在日本是少数说,但在德国,行为无价值二元论成为通说,行为规范违反和法益侵害同时对违法性加以说明,造成这种差异的原因主要包括国家治理理念的不同,目的行为论对德日刑法学的影响不同,以及德国和日本在工业化和社会进程方面有差异。中国刑法学基本立场的定位注定绕不开国家治理的理念和社会转型态势问题。
[Abstract]:According to the dualism of behavior without value, the essence of illegality is to violate the norms of behavior, and at the same time, infringement of legal interests is one of the bases for judging illegality. The penalty can not be determined when the legal interests are infringed or dangerous, but there is no norm violation of the behavior, and the defendant is not guilty when the norms are violated but the legal interests are not infringed. It can be seen from the perspective of the history of the development of illegality and the legislation of criminal law and judicial practice that it is not enough for the judgment of illegality to have only results without value. If only legal interest infringement but no norm violation is considered illegal, the scope of punishment will be enlarged. Based on the analysis of the relationship between the result of aggression and dangerous crime, or the relationship between danger and behavior, it can be found that the result without value can be integrated into the dualism of behavior without value, and thus obtain its own position. There is no internal contradiction in the dualism of behavior without value. The theory of behavior without value is a minority in Japan, but in Germany, the dualism of behavior without value becomes a general theory. The violation of norms of conduct and the infringement of legal interests explain the illegality at the same time. The reasons for this difference mainly include the different ideas of national governance. The influence of Skopos behavior theory on criminal law in Germany and Japan is different, and there are differences in industrialization and social process between Germany and Japan. The orientation of the basic position of Chinese criminal law is doomed to the concept of national governance and social transformation situation.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D914

【共引文献】