组织卖淫罪争议问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 22:14

本文选题：组织卖淫罪 + 组织行为　；参考：《江西理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：组织卖淫罪作为我国刑法罪名中的“新生儿”,直到1997年刑法才正式确立,而条文中仅以简单罪状形式加以规范,难以解决司法实践中各种疑难问题,笔者拟针对本罪争议问题提出自己的观点,以期尽早解决争议。文章共分为四个部分,第一部分为组织卖淫罪的立法概况与概念厘定。首先是将我国组织卖淫罪的立法沿革以及国外卖淫嫖娼类犯罪的立法概况整合梳理,认为国外对于“卖淫”概念的界定对我国具有借鉴意义,同时在刑罚上可以参照国外规定对不同手段行为下的行为根据其情节恶劣程度及社会危害性给予不同法定刑。其次,笔者通过对本罪概念所包含的重要要素进行一一分析,得出组织卖淫罪具体含义是行为人采用招募、雇佣、强迫、引诱、容留、介绍等手段,对多人达到管理控制地位并安排其进行卖淫活动的行为。第二部分为组织卖淫罪构成要件争议问题探究。客体上,应当认为本罪的犯罪客体为社会性道德风尚,不包括人身自由权。犯罪对象不仅限于妇女,也包括男性。客观要件上,应当认为单纯提供“手淫”服务不构成刑法意义上的“卖淫”行为,对其组织者也当然不能成立组织卖淫罪,同时,“强迫”手段应当纳入“组织行为”当中。本罪主体为一般主体,并且单位不能构成本罪;主观上要求行为人只能是在直接故意的心态下完成本罪的客观行为。第三部分为组织卖淫罪的罪间问题探究。首先是对本罪与协助组织卖淫罪的界限进行划分,并认为在组织卖淫罪当中应当有主从犯的划分,组织卖淫罪的从犯应该包括次要实行犯和帮助犯,而协助组织卖淫罪仅仅是对于本罪帮助犯的规定,而非次要实行犯。其次,分析了本罪与强迫卖淫罪之间的界限问题,应当认为,两个罪名区分之关键在于组织卖淫行为所具有的组织性特点。最后是本罪与引诱、容留、介绍卖淫罪间的区分问题,二者的区分重点主要在于行为的组织性和对卖淫活动的“控制”。第四部分为组织卖淫罪的刑罚问题探究。首先,死刑的废除不会构成对罪行极其严重以及与黑社会势力相勾结的组织卖淫行为的放纵。同时在刑罚上应适当降低本罪的起刑点,增设短期自由刑的规定。其次,本罪在刑罚上应当重于强迫卖淫罪。同时应在刑罚设置上划分一定等级,对于采用“强迫”方式的组织卖淫罪应规定重于采用他种手段行为的法定刑。
[Abstract]:The crime of organizing prostitution, as the "newborn" in the criminal law of our country, was not formally established until 1997, and the articles were only standardized in the form of simple counts, so it is difficult to solve all kinds of difficult problems in judicial practice. The author intends to put forward his own point of view in order to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The article is divided into four parts. The first part is the legislative survey and definition of the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the legislative evolution of the crime of organizing prostitution in China and the legislative overview of the crime of prostitution in foreign countries are integrated, and the definition of the concept of "prostitution" in foreign countries is considered to be of reference significance to our country. At the same time, according to the provisions of foreign countries, different legal penalties can be given according to the bad circumstances and social harmfulness of acts under different means. Secondly, through the analysis of the important elements contained in the concept of this crime, the author comes to the conclusion that the specific meaning of the crime of organizing prostitution is that the perpetrator adopts the means of recruitment, employment, coercion, inducement, shelter, introduction, etc. The act of controlling a group of people and arranging for prostitution. The second part is about the dispute of the constitution of the crime of organization prostitution. On the object, the crime object of this crime should be regarded as social morality, excluding the right to personal liberty. The target of the crime is not only women, but men as well. On the objective elements, it should be considered that simply providing "masturbation" service does not constitute "prostitution" in the sense of criminal law, nor can the organizers of it establish the crime of organizing prostitution, at the same time, the means of "compulsion" should be included in the "organization act". The subject of the crime is the general subject and the unit cannot constitute the crime; subjectively, the perpetrator can only accomplish the objective act of the crime in the direct and intentional state of mind. The third part probes into the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the division between this crime and the crime of assisting the organization of prostitution is carried out, and the author thinks that there should be the division of the principal and subordinate in the crime of organizing prostitution, and the accomplice of the crime of organizing prostitution should include the secondary crime and the assistant crime. The crime of aiding the organization of prostitution is only a provision for the crime of aiding, not a secondary crime. Secondly, the paper analyzes the boundary between this crime and the crime of forced prostitution. It should be considered that the key to the distinction between the two crimes lies in the organizational characteristics of the organized prostitution. Finally, it introduces the distinction between the crime of prostitution and the crime of inducement, accommodation and prostitution. The main focus of the distinction lies in the organization of behavior and the "control" of prostitution. The fourth part probes into the punishment of the crime of organizing prostitution. First of all, the abolition of the death penalty would not constitute an indulgence of crimes and prostitution in association with triad forces. At the same time, we should reduce the starting point of this crime and add the stipulation of short-term free penalty. Secondly, the penalty of this crime should be heavier than the crime of forced prostitution. At the same time, the penalty should be divided into certain levels, and the crime of organization prostitution by "compulsion" should be more severe than the statutory punishment of using other means.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.36

【参考文献】