结果加重犯直接关联性理论的本源性反思

发布时间：2018-06-14 15:35

本文选题：直接关联性 + 结果加重犯　；参考：《现代法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：近年来,源于德国的结果加重犯直接关联性理论受到我国许多学者的青睐,但其中存在不少的争议与误解。"直接关联性"是德国法院从多个判例中逐渐形成的规则,其主要功能在于限制结果加重犯的成立范围。从"直接关联性"出发,德国学界发展出风险关联性理论、轻率关联性理论、基础犯罪的保护目的关联性理论等学说。在当代中国刑法教义学中引进直接关联性理论,需要坚持历史的观点和体系性的思维方式,并将其融入客观归责理论体系中。如此才能既保持理论体系的完整性,又能保证合理地限制结果加重犯的成立范围。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the theory of direct relevance of aggravated consequential offense, which originated in Germany, has been favored by many scholars in China, but there are many controversies and misunderstandings. " Direct relevance "is a rule gradually formed by German courts from many cases. Its main function is to limit the scope of establishment of consequential aggravated offense." From the perspective of "direct relevance", German academic circles have developed theories such as risk relevance theory, reckless relevance theory, protection purpose relevance theory of basic crime and so on. To introduce the theory of direct relevance into the dogmatics of contemporary Chinese criminal law, it is necessary to adhere to the historical viewpoint and systematic mode of thinking, and integrate it into the system of objective imputation theory. Only in this way, the integrity of the theoretical system can be maintained and the scope of the consequential aggravated offense can be reasonably restricted.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学研究院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】