论信息传播中技术中立的抗辩——以快播案为例

发布时间：2018-06-22 20:41

  本文选题：快播案 + 技术中立　； 参考：《新闻传播》2016年20期

【摘要】：快播案件的实质是技术与法律的问题,技术中立能够实现对主观状态的屏蔽,进而影响案件性质的正确认定。技术中立的源头——美国,通过三个案例的演进对技术中立的认定已有新的发展。技术中立应更注重维护公共利益,因此快播案中对技术中立抗辩的认定,应当符合技术开发者对技术应用以及可能产生不良后果负有较高的注意和防范义务这一世界通行标准。快播案中被告人的主观意识,显然具有主观故意,综合社会风险和法律效果,本案宜采用阶层性处理方式。
[Abstract]:The essence of the case is the technology and the law. The technology neutrality can shield the subjective state and then influence the correct recognition of the nature of the case. The United States, the source of technology neutrality, has made new progress in the recognition of technology neutrality through the evolution of three cases. Technology neutrality should pay more attention to the public interest, so the determination of defense of technology neutrality in rapier case should accord with the universal standard that the technology developer has higher duty of care and precaution to the application of technology and the possible adverse consequences. The subjective consciousness of the accused in the rapid-broadcast case obviously has subjective intention, comprehensive social risk and legal effect, so this case should be dealt with in a hierarchical way.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3;G206
，

本文编号：2054169