毒品犯罪死刑适用的实证研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 02:36

本文选题：毒品犯罪 + 死刑标准　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：在司法实践中,我国主张严厉打击毒品犯罪的刑事政策,毒品犯罪的死刑占据了全部死刑的较大比例。因为毒品犯罪死刑适用的司法标准存在缺陷,在死刑适用常常发生分歧与争议,导致死刑适用出现了混乱、不统一;通过分析典型案例归纳死刑适用出现争议和分歧的主要原因:死刑数量标准的不统一与不确定、数量加情节的量刑方法过于原则、立法中未规定毒品数量以毒品纯度折算、犯罪既遂与未遂的划分不准确、法定量刑情节与死刑适用的关系未理顺、共同犯罪中如何适用死刑不准确等等。为了实现死刑统一公正的适用,笔者通过实证研究、比较研究等方法论述了对适用死刑的毒品犯罪,统一规范了数量标准,确立死刑适用的前提;应当对犯罪人所涉毒品数量进行纯度折算,科学准确计算毒品数量;应当将“数量加情节”的规定具体化,将死刑适用方法规范化;应当理顺法定量刑情节和死刑适用的关系,准确把握各种法定量刑情节对死刑的影响;应准确划分犯罪的既遂与未遂,防止死刑适用的扩大化;应当准确区分各共同犯罪人的地位和作用,对各共同犯罪人准确适用死刑。面对毒品犯罪如何统一公正适用死刑的重大课题,进行了深入的思考和总结,提出了毒品犯罪死刑适用应当确立的司法理念和司法实践中具体应当完善与改进的方面,进而以实现大幅缩减毒品犯罪死刑适用的空间。本文从毒品犯罪死刑适用的基本方法和司法理念的角度出发,就确保毒品犯罪死刑统一公正的适用提供参考和借鉴的意见,对限制减少毒品犯罪死刑适用进行了思考。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, our country advocates the criminal policy of cracking down on drug crimes, and the death penalty for drug crimes accounts for a large proportion of the total death penalty. Because there are defects in the judicial standards of the application of the death penalty for drug crimes, there are often differences and disputes in the application of the death penalty, which leads to confusion and disunity in the application of the death penalty; Through the analysis of typical cases, the main reasons of disputes and differences in the application of death penalty are summarized: the inconsistency and uncertainty of the standard of death penalty quantity, the excessive principle of sentencing method of quantity plus circumstances, the legislation does not stipulate that the quantity of drugs is converted into the purity of drugs. The division between accomplished crime and attempted crime is not accurate, the relationship between the legal circumstances of sentencing and the application of the death penalty is not straightened out, and how to apply the death penalty in the joint crime is inaccurate and so on. In order to realize the application of the death penalty in a unified and fair way, the author discusses the drug crimes to which the death penalty is applied, standardizes the standard of quantity and establishes the premise of the application of the death penalty by means of empirical research and comparative study. The quantity of drugs involved by the offender shall be converted into purity, and the quantity of drugs shall be calculated scientifically and accurately; the provisions of "quantity plus circumstances" shall be concretized and the method of application of the death penalty shall be standardized; and the relationship between the statutory circumstances of sentencing and the application of the death penalty shall be straightened out. Accurately grasp the impact of various statutory circumstances of sentencing on the death penalty; should accurately divide the crime accomplished and attempted to prevent the extension of the application of the death penalty; should accurately distinguish the status and role of each joint offender and apply the death penalty to each joint offender accurately. In the face of the important issue of how to apply the death penalty in a unified and fair manner, the author makes a deep thinking and summary, and puts forward the judicial concept and aspects that should be perfected and improved in the application of the death penalty for drug crimes. In order to achieve a significant reduction in drug crime, the application of the death penalty space. From the point of view of the basic methods and judicial concepts of the application of the death penalty for drug-related crimes, this paper provides references and suggestions for ensuring the uniform and fair application of the death penalty for drug-related crimes, and gives some thoughts on the limitation and reduction of the application of the death penalty for drug-related crimes.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】