侵犯商业秘密案件“被害性”的实证研究

发布时间：2018-06-27 18:22

本文选题：商业秘密 + 实证研究　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在市场经济高速发展的今天,商业秘密对企业具有显著的价值,能够帮助企业提高自身的核心竞争力,从而在激烈的市场竞争中取得优势。然而,在当前司法实践当中,侵犯商业秘密案件却比比皆是,企业对自身商业秘密的保护状况令人堪忧。因此,对侵犯商业秘密行为进行研究并加强商业秘密保护是不可回避的话题。然而,学者们对侵犯商业秘密行为的研究主要集中在一些理论问题上,如商业秘密的构成和认定、侵犯商业秘密行为的构成和认定、商业秘密法律保护等,鲜有学者从“被害性”的角度对司法实践中侵犯商业秘密案件进行实证研究的范例。基于此,本文以实证研究的方法对侵犯商业秘密案件的“被害性”进行研究。本文一共收集了1705份商业秘密裁判文书,并根据本文的研究目的设计了若干变量,进而从裁判文书中摘录这些变量来进行分析。本文主要以“被害性”作为自变量,被害损失作为因变量,研究被害损失与“被害性”各个指标之间的关联关系。首先,本文从损失金额的角度来研究“被害性”与案件损失金额的关系。本文将损失金额与“被害性”各个指标进行了均值比较,从中探知损失金额与保密协议、竞业限制协议、被害违法、内外勾结、权利取得方式、重点区域管理之间的相关性,这些因素会在不同层面影响侵犯商业秘密案件中被害人的损失金额。其次,本文从得逞率的角度来研究“被害性”与案件得逞率的关系。本文将得逞率与“被害性”的各个指标进行了交互分析,从中得知得逞率与被害违法、内外勾结、权利取得方式具有一定的相关性,并且还发现到得逞率与保密协议、竞业限制协议、重点区域管理并无多大关联,从而打破了传统偏见。最后,本文从案件持续时间的角度来研究“被害性”与案件持续时间的关系。本文将案件持续时间与“被害性”各个指标进行了均值比较,从中探析案件持续时间与保密协议、竞业限制协议、被害违法、内外勾结、权利取得方式、重点区域管理具有一定的相关性,并且这些因素都会在不同层面影响案件的持续时间。在对上述现状和原因进行梳理和分析后,本文认为,侵犯商业秘密案件被害人的被害损失的确与其自身的“被害性”有关,商业秘密权利人要想有效降低自身的损失,必须要采取相应的措施来减少和控制自身的“被害性”,进而保护其商业秘密。
[Abstract]:Today, with the rapid development of market economy, trade secrets have remarkable value to enterprises, which can help enterprises to improve their core competitiveness and thus gain advantages in the fierce market competition. However, in the current judicial practice, cases of infringing trade secrets are everywhere, and enterprises' protection of their own trade secrets is worrying. Therefore, it is an unavoidable topic to study and strengthen the protection of trade secrets. However, scholars' research on infringing trade secrets mainly focuses on some theoretical issues, such as the composition and determination of trade secrets, the constitution and determination of infringing trade secrets, the legal protection of trade secrets, etc. Few scholars do empirical research on trade secret infringement cases in judicial practice from the perspective of victimization. Based on this, this paper studies the victimization of trade secret infringement cases by empirical research. In this paper, 1705 documents of trade secret judgment are collected, and some variables are designed according to the purpose of this paper, and these variables are extracted from the documents for analysis. This paper mainly takes "victimization" as independent variable and victimized loss as dependent variable, and studies the relationship between victimization loss and each index of "victimization". First of all, this paper studies the relationship between victimization and the amount of loss from the point of view of the amount of loss. This paper compares the amount of loss with the average value of each index of "victimization", and finds out the correlation between the amount of loss and confidentiality agreement, the agreement on restriction of non-competition, the violation of the law, collusion between the inside and outside, the way of obtaining the right, and the management of the key area. These factors will affect the victim's loss amount in the case of trade secret violation at different levels. Secondly, this paper studies the relationship between victimization and case success rate from the angle of success rate. In this paper, the success rate and each index of "victimization" are interactively analyzed, from which we know that the success rate has certain correlation with the illegal, collusion between the inside and outside, the way of obtaining the right, and also found that the success rate and the confidentiality agreement. Competition restriction agreement, key area management is not much related, thus breaking the traditional prejudice. Finally, this paper studies the relationship between victimization and case duration from the point of view of case duration. This paper compares the case duration with the average value of each index of "victimization", and probes into the case duration and confidentiality agreement, competition restriction agreement, murdered illegal, collusion between inside and outside, and the way of obtaining rights. The key area management has certain correlation, and these factors will affect the duration of the case at different levels. After combing and analyzing the above situation and reasons, the author thinks that the victim's loss in the trade secret case is really related to his own "victimization", and the owner of the trade secret's right wants to reduce his own loss effectively. We must take appropriate measures to reduce and control their "victimization", and then protect their trade secrets.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】