论聚众哄抢罪与相关犯罪的界限与竞合

发布时间：2018-06-30 21:59

本文选题：聚众哄抢罪 + 公然盗窃　；参考：《南京师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：从大量司法判决来看,聚众哄抢罪与其它财产的界限还是很模糊。在我国传统定义上的聚众哄抢罪很难与抢劫罪,抢夺罪、盗窃罪作出清晰的界分。随着理论的发展,盗窃罪与抢夺罪的界限不再以是否秘密为界限,而是以对人身具有危险性来区分盗窃与抢夺。这对于聚众哄抢罪来说有非常重要的借鉴意义。研究聚众哄抢罪应当引入暴力程度不同作为研究方法。聚众哄抢罪应当被定义为多人公然实施的,导致被害人难以施以阻止的盗窃行为。其主要的特点为公然性、无暴力性,被哄抢者占有的松散性以及聚众性。所以,聚众哄抢与抢夺不存在竞合关系,对人身不具危险性,不是多人实施的抢夺行为,更不是多人实施的抢劫行为。
[Abstract]:Judging from a large number of judicial decisions, the line between the crime of mass robbery and other property is still blurred. It is very difficult to distinguish the crime of mugging, robbing and larceny from the crime of robberies in the traditional definition of our country. With the development of theory, the boundary between theft and robbery is no longer classified as secret, but based on personal danger. This is a very important reference for the crime of mass robbery. Different degree of violence should be introduced as a research method to study the crime of mass robbery. The crime of mass robbery should be defined as an act of theft that is openly carried out by many people and which makes it difficult for the victim to prevent it. Its main characteristics are open, non-violent, the loose possession of the looters and mass. Therefore, there is no relationship between ransacking and looting, which is not dangerous to the person, nor is it the act of plunder carried out by many people, much less the act of robberies committed by many people.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】