论贪污受贿犯罪中量刑不均衡的问题与对策

发布时间：2018-07-01 19:00

本文选题：贪污 + 受贿　；参考：《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：贪污受贿犯罪是世界各国共同面临的职务犯罪类型，随着我国改革开放的深入和经济建设的发展，国家工作人员涉嫌贪污受贿犯罪的人数也不断增加，贪污受贿案件的查处事关党和政府的形象及司法公信力问题，受到了社会各界的广泛关注，尤其是领导干部贪污受贿犯罪案件已经成为社会关注的热点问题。但近年来，，贪污受贿犯罪不平衡问题愈来愈引起社会各界的关注和争论，量刑不平衡的现象不利于遏制职务犯罪和反腐败斗争的深入开展，司法机关应高度重视并着力解决。本文针对贪污受贿罪量刑不平衡问题，归纳了其特点和危害，从立法、司法、非法三个层面分析了这种情况产生的原因，随后结合国外的一些先进理念，提出对贪污受贿罪量刑规范化的几点设想，为解决贪污受贿罪的量刑不平衡提供一些意见。本文从以下四个部分对贪污受贿犯罪量刑不平衡情况进行分析：第一部分通过对上海某基层检察院2010年至2012年办理的所有贪污受贿案件进行分析和归纳，总结出贪污受贿罪量刑不平衡的表现特点，并分析了这种情况的危害。第二部分对贪污受贿罪量刑不平衡的原因从立法缺陷、司法理念偏差、非法因素干扰三个角度进行了分析。第三部分对一些西方发达国家贪污受贿案件的立法和量刑与我国现行刑法规定进行了对比，从新加坡、美国等国对惩治贪污受贿案件的处置上学习和借鉴经验。第四部分综合本文的前三部分，从立法、司法、监督这三个方面，提出针对贪污受贿罪量刑不平衡的解决之道。
[Abstract]:The crime of embezzlement and bribery is a common type of duty crime faced by all countries in the world. With the deepening of reform and opening up and the development of economic construction in China, the number of state functionaries suspected of corruption and bribery is also increasing. The investigation and treatment of corruption and bribery cases is related to the image of the Party and the government and the credibility of the judiciary, which has received extensive attention from all walks of life, especially the criminal cases of leading cadres' corruption and bribery has become a hot issue of social concern. However, in recent years, the imbalance of corruption and bribery crime has attracted more and more attention and debate from all walks of life in the society. The phenomenon of unbalance in sentencing is not conducive to the further development of duty crime and the struggle against corruption. The judiciary should attach great importance to it and make efforts to solve it. Aiming at the unbalanced sentencing of the crime of corruption and bribery, this paper sums up its characteristics and harm, analyzes the causes of this situation from the three aspects of legislation, judicature and illegality, and then combines some advanced ideas from abroad. This paper puts forward some tentative ideas on the standardization of sentencing for the crime of corruption and bribery, and provides some suggestions for solving the imbalance in sentencing of the crime of corruption and acceptance of bribes. This paper analyzes the imbalance in sentencing of corruption and bribery crime from the following four parts: the first part analyzes and summarizes all cases of corruption and bribery handled by a grass-roots procuratorate in Shanghai from 2010 to 2012. Summed up the crime of corruption and bribery sentencing imbalance characteristics, and analyzed the harm of this situation. In the second part, the author analyzes the reasons of the imbalance in sentencing of corruption and bribery from three angles: legislative defect, judicial concept deviation and illegal factor interference. The third part compares the legislation and sentencing of corruption and bribery cases in some western developed countries with the current criminal law of our country, and learns and draws lessons from Singapore, the United States and other countries on the punishment of corruption and bribery cases. The fourth part synthesizes the first three parts of this article, from the legislation, the judicature, the supervision these three aspects, proposes the solution to the crime of corruption and bribery sentencing imbalance.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392

【参考文献】