生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪司法适用研究

发布时间：2018-07-07 11:58

本文选题：安全标准 + 宽严相济　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国经济的高速发展，改革正深入转型期，如何看待日益触动我们心灵底线的食品安全犯罪问题，是持“严厉”还是“宽容”的态度，是注重维护社会公共利益还是侧重保障犯罪人的基本人权，不仅关系到人民群众“舌尖上的安全”，而且关系到现代法治理念的确立，关键在于如何在司法实践中理性地把握和运用宽严相济的刑事政策。本文即以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪的司法适用为对象，系统地讨论如何在实践中把握本罪的“宽”与“严”。文章共分为以下四个部分：第一部分对本罪的刑事立法历史沿革进行梳理和诠释，并对数次立法变革背后立法者及司法者的价值追求和刑事政策作了系统地分析，，从而为下文的研究提供了方向。第二部分对当前我国生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪司法适用现状进行深入地分析，特别是对本罪司法实践中存在的“过严”和“过宽”之处及其原因，进行理性地探讨和剖释。第三部分是文章的重点，重点论述了宽严相济刑事政策下本罪司法适用的应然价值，尤其是全面地剖析了本罪适用中“宽”与“严”的价值要素，为本文的对策探讨奠定了理论基础。第四部分作为本罪司法适用的对策研究，从主客观相统一原则、犯罪化与非犯罪化理论以及法条竞合理论等方面系统地阐明了理性把握本罪适用“宽”与“严”的解决思路，并从食品安全犯罪防范的全局出发，提出了完善食品监管渎职行为认定的建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our country's economy and the deepening of the reform period, how to look at the problem of food safety crimes, which increasingly touches the bottom line of our hearts, is to adopt a "strict" or "tolerant" attitude. It is not only related to the safety of the people on the tip of the tongue, but also related to the establishment of the concept of modern rule of law. The key lies in how to rationally grasp and apply the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity in judicial practice. This paper discusses how to grasp the "leniency" and "strictness" of this crime in practice by taking the judicial application of the crime of producing and selling food which does not conform to the safety standard as the object. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part combs and interprets the history of the criminal legislation of this crime, and makes a systematic analysis of the value pursuit and criminal policy of the legislators and the judiciary behind several legislative changes. Thus, it provides a direction for the following research. The second part makes a deep analysis on the current situation of judicial application of food crime which does not meet the safety standards in our country, especially on the "too strict" and "too wide" in the judicial practice of this crime and its reasons. To conduct rational discussion and interpretation. The third part is the emphasis of the article, which focuses on the necessary value of the judicial application of this crime under the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, especially comprehensively analyzes the value elements of "leniency" and "strictness" in the application of this crime. It lays a theoretical foundation for the discussion of countermeasures in this paper. The fourth part, as the countermeasure research of the judicial application of this crime, systematically expounds the solution thinking of rationally grasping the application of "leniency" and "strictness" from the aspects of the principle of unification of subjective and objective, the theory of criminalization and decriminalization, and the theory of competing articles of law. From the overall situation of food safety crime prevention, the paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the malfeasance of food supervision.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】