刑法合宪性解释的意义重构与关系重建——一个罪刑法定主义的理论逻辑

发布时间：2018-07-08 08:09

本文选题：刑法 + 合宪性解释　；参考：《现代法学》2015年03期

【摘要】：从宪法与刑法的关系、近代刑法产生与发展的过程以及国外刑法理论对合宪性解释的解释来看,刑法的合宪性解释是指对刑法做出合乎罪刑法定原则的解释。提倡合宪性解释,对刑法领域法治的实现、划定刑法解释的界限以及厘定刑法理论的发展方向,均具有重要意义。合宪性解释是一种解释限度,而非具体的刑法解释方法,但对刑法解释方法构成了明显的制约。合宪性解释应当在所有的刑法解释方法中得到贯彻,因而与刑法解释方法之间不存在位阶关系;而且,从逻辑和解释实践来看,刑法解释方法之间也不存在位阶关系。在形式上,对刑法做出未超出文义范围的解释结论就满足了合宪性解释的要求;从实质上看,合宪性解释的贯彻还得借助于体系解释、历史解释、目的解释等刑法解释方法的具体运用。
[Abstract]:From the relationship between constitution and criminal law, the process of the emergence and development of modern criminal law and the interpretation of constitutionality in foreign criminal law theory, the constitutionality interpretation of criminal law refers to the interpretation of criminal law in accordance with the principle of legality. It is of great significance for the realization of the rule of law in the field of criminal law, the delineation of the limits of the interpretation of criminal law and the development direction of the theory of criminal law to advocate constitutional interpretation. Constitutional interpretation is a limit of interpretation, not a specific method of interpretation of criminal law, but it constitutes an obvious restriction on the method of interpretation of criminal law. Constitutionality interpretation should be carried out in all the methods of criminal law interpretation, so there is no rank relation between it and criminal law interpretation method, and from logic and interpretation practice, there is no rank relation between criminal law interpretation method and criminal law interpretation method. In form, the conclusion that the criminal law does not exceed the scope of meaning satisfies the requirements of constitutional interpretation. In essence, the implementation of constitutional interpretation has to be carried out with the help of system interpretation and historical interpretation. The concrete application of interpretation methods of criminal law, such as interpretation of purpose.
【作者单位】：河北大学政法学院;
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】