刑法中居间介绍行为的定性研究

发布时间：2018-07-20 21:11

【摘要】：居间介绍行为引入民法中后,出现居间合同、居间人的概念。当所提供的信息涉及违法犯罪时,该类行为即进入刑法规范范畴,这就是本课题论述的居间介绍型犯罪行为。至今,我国现行刑法对居间介绍犯罪行为的处理有三种方法,一种即将居间介绍行为独立设制一个罪名,如介绍卖淫罪和介绍贿赂罪;还有一种是作为关联犯罪的共犯处理;还有一种直接以情节轻微作了出罪处理。这几种明显不同的处理方式使居间介绍犯罪行为在理论界争论不休,也给司法实务带来困惑。然而,常年以来,鲜有专家学者对居间介绍行为进行一个系统的论述,更多的还是就某一案例、某一罪名进行探讨。故本人愚见,对刑法中的居间介绍行为进行一个全面的论述与探讨,对当下司法实务意义巨大。对该行为进行准确的定性,对于解决司法实践中的困惑有指点迷津的作用。本文正文分为三部分,四大章节。第一章,从刑法中该行为的概述述起,对该行为概念的现有观点进行了陈述,并阐明本人观点。同时对该行为的特征、类型进行了阐述,使我们能够初步对该行为进行把握。第二章,以该行为的立法与司法现状为角度,列明我国对此的立法现状、特点,以及此现状下的实务难题,特别是对现有的两个介绍个罪,在司法实践中出现介绍贿赂行为与行贿、受贿罪的认定问题、量刑轻重差异。为下文提出讨论的焦点:刑法上居间介绍行为如何定性。这是本文的第一部分。第三章,是本文的重点,也是本课题的论证部分。第一节写刑法上居间介绍行为定性的理论争鸣,通过对几种不同理论进行辨析,展现出刑法上居间介绍行为的理论分歧。第二节从居间介绍的词义来源、共犯中帮助犯的理论、毒品犯罪中介绍行为的规定以及国际立法多角度对刑法上居间介绍行为定性进行探讨。由此得出本人关于本课题的结论:应定性为共犯,对于现行刑法中的立法应当取消个罪,统一以共犯定位。第三节对本人结论展开论述。通过本人对该课题的研究,深入挖掘刑法上居间介绍犯罪行为在法理上无法轻易出罪以及在犯罪构成上不满足独立成罪的原因。据此,充分地论证本人的结论:应定性为共犯。以上是本文的第二部分。第四章共两节,第一节,分析在共犯定性的情况下,取消个罪后,介绍贿赂行为、介绍卖淫行为的罪名认定。第二节,几个相关问题:如居间合同的区分、对关联犯罪所起的作用判断、成立犯罪的标准、停止形态的认定以及新型的居间介绍犯罪行为方式。最后一节居间介绍犯罪行为新形式的探讨是一个相对新颖的点,目前虽不多见,对于探讨本课题却有点睛之功用。这是第三部分的内容。本文的写作脉络基本如此。
[Abstract]:After the introduction of intermediation into civil law, the concept of intermediary contract appears. When the information provided involves illegal crimes, this kind of behavior will enter the scope of criminal law norms, which is the intermediate introductory crime discussed in this subject. Up to now, there are three ways to deal with the crime of intermediation in the current criminal law of our country, one is to set up an independent charge of the act of introducing intermediation, such as the crime of introducing prostitution and the crime of introducing bribery, the other is to deal with the crime as an accomplice of the related crime. There is also one that is directly treated as a minor offence. These obvious different ways of handling make the intermediary introduce criminal behavior controversial in the theoretical circle, but also bring confusion to the judicial practice. However, for many years, few experts and scholars have made a systematic discussion on the intermediation behavior, and more on a case or a crime. Therefore, my humble opinion, to the criminal law in the intermediary introduction behavior of a comprehensive discussion and discussion, for the current judicial practice of great significance. The accurate characterization of this behavior is helpful to solve the confusion in judicial practice. This text is divided into three parts, four chapters. In the first chapter, from the summary of the act in the criminal law, the author states the existing viewpoint of the concept of the act, and expounds his own point of view. At the same time, the characteristics and types of the behavior are expounded, so that we can grasp the behavior. In the second chapter, from the angle of the legislation and judicial status of the act, it lists the current legislative situation, characteristics, and practical problems under the present situation, especially the two existing introduction crimes. In judicial practice, bribery and bribery, bribery crime, sentencing differences. The focus of the following discussion is how to characterize the behavior of intermediation in criminal law. This is the first part of this paper. The third chapter, is the focal point of this article, also is the demonstration part of this subject. The first section is about the theory of the qualitative nature of intermediary introduction in criminal law. Through the analysis of several different theories, it shows the theoretical differences of intermediate introduction in criminal law. The second section discusses the nature of intermediation in criminal law from the perspective of the origin of the word meaning, the theory of accomplice in accomplices, the provisions of introducing behavior in drug crimes and international legislation. The conclusion of this paper is as follows: it should be characterized as accomplice, and the legislation in the current criminal law should abolish the crime and unify the position of accomplice. The third section discusses my conclusion. Through my research on this subject, the author deeply explores the reasons why criminal behavior can not be easily committed in the criminal law and that the criminal constitution is not satisfied with the independence of the crime. On this basis, I fully demonstrate the conclusion: should be characterized as accomplice. Above is the second part of this paper. The fourth chapter consists of two sections. The first section analyzes the crime of bribery and the conviction of prostitution after cancelling the crime of complicity. The second section, several related issues: such as the distinction of the intermediary contract, the function judgment of the related crime, the standard of establishing the crime, the recognition of the stop form and the new type of intermediary introducing the criminal behavior. The last section is a relatively new point to introduce the new forms of criminal behavior. Although it is rare at present, it has the function of focusing on this subject. This is the third part. This is basically the writing context of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】