绑架罪既遂问题研究
发布时间：2018-07-31 06:42
【摘要】：为能更好的对绑架犯罪进行治理,我国先后于1991年、1997年、2009年、2015年四次在刑法规范层面对绑架罪进行了修改、补充、完善,形成了一个较为科学的刑罚体系,为治理绑架犯罪提供了坚强的法律保障。然而,绑架罪在立法上的抽象性以及绑架罪罪质本身的复杂性,导致了人们对绑架犯罪的认识上存在差异。这种认识上的差异作用于司法实践中,就会出现“同样的情况不同的处理”的现象。在这些认识差异中,绑架罪的犯罪形态争议最激烈。因上述认识问题,不同司法者对具体个案的评价不同,其审判结果也就自然存在差异,甚至出入较大。为此,我们就有必要对绑架罪的犯罪完成形态进行探讨和研究,笔者主要根据《刑法修正案(七)》、《刑法修正案(九)》从绑架罪的基本犯罪、绑架罪的加重和减轻的犯罪构成来讨论绑架罪的既遂未遂问题。本文主要从以下几个部分来论述。绪论:从故意犯罪停止形态的概念、特征及意义来研究绑架罪既遂的意义,以及从理论和实践两个角度简要概述绑架罪既遂标准的争议。第一章:从绑架罪的立法沿革上,着重以《刑法修正案(七)》、《刑法修正案(九)》的修正背景和修正内容,研究对绑架罪既遂认定的影响。第二章:结合经典案例探讨绑架罪基本犯既遂的标准,从绑架罪的法益界定和绑架罪的实行行为两个角度来分析,什么时候构成绑架罪基本犯的既遂。第三章:从结果加重犯的角度研究刑法239条第2款,“杀害被绑架人”、“故意伤害被绑架人,致人重伤”和“故意伤害被绑架人,致人死亡”有无既遂未遂。第四章:从情节犯的角度分析绑架罪情节犯的既遂问题,分别分析情节犯的含义,情节犯是否存在犯罪未遂形态,得出“情节较轻”是情节犯的结论,结合经典案例对绑架罪“情节较轻”的“情节”内涵、要素以及绑架罪“情节较轻”的既遂界定。通过这几部分论述来明确绑架罪的既遂标准,更好地去指导实践以求形成统一共识,避免同样情况不同处理的现象发生,从而有效维护好人们的合法权益,维护社会的的安定性和刑法的权威性。
[Abstract]:In order to deal with the kidnapping crime better, in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, the crime of kidnapping was revised, supplemented and perfected four times in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, and a more scientific penalty system was formed. For the control of kidnapping crime to provide a strong legal protection. However, the abstract nature of the crime of kidnapping in legislation and the complexity of the crime of kidnapping itself lead to differences in people's understanding of the crime of kidnapping. This kind of difference of understanding acts on the judicial practice, and the phenomenon of "the same situation and different treatment" will appear. Among these differences, the criminal form of kidnapping is the most controversial. As a result of the above problems, different judiciaries have different evaluation of specific cases, and their trial results are naturally different, or even quite different. Therefore, it is necessary for us to probe into and study the complete form of the crime of kidnapping. According to the Criminal Law Amendment (7), the Criminal Law Amendment (9), from the basic crime of kidnapping, The crime of kidnapping is aggravated and mitigated to discuss the problem of attempted accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping. This article mainly discusses from the following several parts. Introduction: to study the significance of accomplished kidnapping crime from the concept, characteristics and significance of the form of intentional crime cessation, and briefly summarize the controversy of the standard of accomplished kidnapping crime from two angles of theory and practice. Chapter one: from the legislative evolution of the crime of kidnapping, with the amendment background and content of "Amendment of Criminal Law (7) > and" Amendment of Criminal Law "(9), the author studies the influence on the conviction of the crime of kidnapping. The second chapter discusses the standard of accomplishing the basic crime of kidnapping in combination with classic cases, and analyzes from the two angles of the definition of legal interests of the crime of kidnapping and the practice of the crime of kidnapping, when constitutes the accomplished of the basic crime of kidnapping. Chapter three: from the point of view of aggravated consequential offense, the article 239 (2) of Criminal Law, "killing kidnapped person", "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing serious injury" and "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing death" is attempted or not. Chapter four: from the angle of plot crime, analyze the accomplished problem of kidnapping crime, analyze the meaning of plot crime, whether the plot offender has the form of attempted crime, and draw the conclusion that "the plot is lighter" is the plot crime. Combined with classic cases, the connotation of "plot" of the crime of kidnapping is lighter, the elements and the accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping are defined. Through these several parts of discussion to clarify the accomplished standard of kidnapping crime, better guide the practice in order to form a unified consensus, to avoid the phenomenon of different treatment of the same situation, so as to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of people. To maintain the stability of society and the authority of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
[Abstract]:In order to deal with the kidnapping crime better, in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, the crime of kidnapping was revised, supplemented and perfected four times in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, and a more scientific penalty system was formed. For the control of kidnapping crime to provide a strong legal protection. However, the abstract nature of the crime of kidnapping in legislation and the complexity of the crime of kidnapping itself lead to differences in people's understanding of the crime of kidnapping. This kind of difference of understanding acts on the judicial practice, and the phenomenon of "the same situation and different treatment" will appear. Among these differences, the criminal form of kidnapping is the most controversial. As a result of the above problems, different judiciaries have different evaluation of specific cases, and their trial results are naturally different, or even quite different. Therefore, it is necessary for us to probe into and study the complete form of the crime of kidnapping. According to the Criminal Law Amendment (7), the Criminal Law Amendment (9), from the basic crime of kidnapping, The crime of kidnapping is aggravated and mitigated to discuss the problem of attempted accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping. This article mainly discusses from the following several parts. Introduction: to study the significance of accomplished kidnapping crime from the concept, characteristics and significance of the form of intentional crime cessation, and briefly summarize the controversy of the standard of accomplished kidnapping crime from two angles of theory and practice. Chapter one: from the legislative evolution of the crime of kidnapping, with the amendment background and content of "Amendment of Criminal Law (7) > and" Amendment of Criminal Law "(9), the author studies the influence on the conviction of the crime of kidnapping. The second chapter discusses the standard of accomplishing the basic crime of kidnapping in combination with classic cases, and analyzes from the two angles of the definition of legal interests of the crime of kidnapping and the practice of the crime of kidnapping, when constitutes the accomplished of the basic crime of kidnapping. Chapter three: from the point of view of aggravated consequential offense, the article 239 (2) of Criminal Law, "killing kidnapped person", "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing serious injury" and "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing death" is attempted or not. Chapter four: from the angle of plot crime, analyze the accomplished problem of kidnapping crime, analyze the meaning of plot crime, whether the plot offender has the form of attempted crime, and draw the conclusion that "the plot is lighter" is the plot crime. Combined with classic cases, the connotation of "plot" of the crime of kidnapping is lighter, the elements and the accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping are defined. Through these several parts of discussion to clarify the accomplished standard of kidnapping crime, better guide the practice in order to form a unified consensus, to avoid the phenomenon of different treatment of the same situation, so as to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of people. To maintain the stability of society and the authority of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张明楷;;绑架罪的基本问题[J];法学;2016年04期
2 曾庆云;;绑架罪及其类型化分析[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2014年12期
3 聂郁蒙;;绑架罪争议问题浅析[J];湖北警官学院学报;2014年05期
4 陈越;;论绑架罪的既遂标准[J];湖南科技学院学报;2013年08期
5 付立庆;;绑架罪既遂标准的重新论证——以刑法修正案(七)的相关修改为背景[J];法学评论;2012年01期
6 吴情树;;绑架罪中“情节较轻”的辩证分析——基于对《刑法修正案(七)》第六条的思考[J];政治与法律;2010年03期
7 梅锦;;绑架罪的既遂标准探究[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
8 杨志国;;认定绑架罪“情节较轻”的几个理论问题[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年11期
9 周帆;张冬霞;;绑架罪之法定刑分析——兼论《刑法修正案(七)》对绑架罪的修改[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
10 王志祥;;绑架罪中“杀害被绑架人”新论[J];法商研究;2008年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 黄祥青;;绑架罪的既遂标准及认定思路[N];人民法院报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张文娟;绑架罪司法认定疑难问题研究[D];云南大学;2015年
2 蔡正猛;绑架罪中“杀害被绑架人”问题研究[D];内蒙古大学;2014年
3 李馨雅;绑架罪的既遂标准认定[D];华东政法大学;2013年
4 敖军荣;绑架犯罪形态研究[D];南昌大学;2012年
5 满春梅;绑架罪相关犯罪形态的司法界定[D];兰州大学;2012年
6 潘宗洪;罪刑均衡视野下的绑架罪法定刑配置问题研究[D];华侨大学;2012年
7 郭，
本文编号：2154756
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2154756.html
