论“受过行政处罚”与定罪的关系
发布时间：2018-08-01 17:45
【摘要】：在刑法立法与司法实践中，，“受过行政处罚”的统一刑法立法模式一直是一个围绕立法者与司法者的难题，几年来我国最高人民法院与最高人民检察院针对经济犯罪和妨碍社会管理秩序犯罪出台的司法解释中越来越多地将“受过行政处罚”作为定罪量刑的一种依据，更加引起法学界对这方面的广泛关注。我国刑法和司法解释关于“受过行政处罚”在定罪中的地位的规定反映了此种人比一次犯罪者具有更深的主观恶性与社会危害性，刑法作为保障法与最后手段的特性，应当守住最后一道防线，给予受过行政处罚者又实施犯罪行为否定性评价。但是，学术界对此方面研究几乎没有，因此从这一角度处罚，将目前“受过行政处罚”相关刑法法律条文进行归类分析，得出不同模式，分析各模式的优劣，寻找统一标准，实现行政处罚与刑罚处罚的完美衔接，构建法律体例一体化。
[Abstract]:In the criminal law legislation and judicial practice, the unified criminal law legislation model of "received administrative punishment" has always been a difficult problem around legislators and judiciaries. Over the past few years, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate have increasingly used "administrative punishment" as a basis for conviction and sentencing in the judicial interpretations of economic crimes and crimes against social management order. It has attracted more and more attention in the field of law. The provisions of our criminal law and judicial interpretation on the status of "administrative punishment" in the conviction reflect that such persons have deeper subjective malignancy and social harmfulness than a single offender, and that criminal law is characterized as a safeguard law and a last resort. We should hold the last line of defense and give negative evaluation to those who have been punished by administrative punishment. However, there is almost no academic research on this aspect. Therefore, from this angle of punishment, the relevant articles of criminal law are classified and analyzed, and different models are obtained, the advantages and disadvantages of each model are analyzed, and a unified standard is found. Realize the perfect connection between administrative punishment and penalty punishment, and construct the integration of legal style.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924
本文编号：2158354
[Abstract]:In the criminal law legislation and judicial practice, the unified criminal law legislation model of "received administrative punishment" has always been a difficult problem around legislators and judiciaries. Over the past few years, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate have increasingly used "administrative punishment" as a basis for conviction and sentencing in the judicial interpretations of economic crimes and crimes against social management order. It has attracted more and more attention in the field of law. The provisions of our criminal law and judicial interpretation on the status of "administrative punishment" in the conviction reflect that such persons have deeper subjective malignancy and social harmfulness than a single offender, and that criminal law is characterized as a safeguard law and a last resort. We should hold the last line of defense and give negative evaluation to those who have been punished by administrative punishment. However, there is almost no academic research on this aspect. Therefore, from this angle of punishment, the relevant articles of criminal law are classified and analyzed, and different models are obtained, the advantages and disadvantages of each model are analyzed, and a unified standard is found. Realize the perfect connection between administrative punishment and penalty punishment, and construct the integration of legal style.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵永红;人身危险性概念新论[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年04期
2 林亚刚;张莉琼;;反复实施危害行为的成罪及处罚模式探讨[J];法学评论;2009年03期
3 刘德法;孔德琴;;论多次犯[J];法治研究;2011年09期
4 朱俊强;论邪教犯罪对刑法法益的侵害及其认定[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
5 徐启明;;论刑罚和行政处罚的关系与发展[J];西部法学评论;2009年03期
6 蔡雅奇;;我国刑法累犯制度设立的理论根据初探[J];湖北警官学院学报;2009年01期
7 童伟华;数额犯若干问题研究[J];华侨大学学报(人文社会科学版);2001年04期
8 杨书文;;经济犯罪立案追诉标准的理解与适用[J];江西警察学院学报;2013年02期
9 刘宪章;累受行政处罚者的刑罚适用[J];人民检察;2003年05期
10 李恩民;多次违法构成犯罪初探[J];人民检察;1999年02期
本文编号：2158354
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2158354.html
