论刑法中的醉态
发布时间:2018-08-08 19:38
【摘要】:在当今世界各国,行为人陷入醉态后实施侵害法益的现象屡见不鲜,各国对醉态行为人刑事责任的规定不一,理论上存在分歧。我国在立法上仅规定了醉酒人的刑罚,且并未对“醉态”进行明确的界定。这给司法实践中对醉态后刑事责任的追究带来了诸多困惑。因此,开展涵盖酒精、毒品和药物等具有致醉药理物质的醉态理论研究以及完善我国醉态相关立法具有现实意义。通过运用医学、精神病学和心理学的相关知识,界定出醉态的概念并且总结出其特征。接着,,详细梳理了大陆法系中的原因自由行为,并阐述了我国“三根据说”、“严格责任说”等醉态理论的主要内容及其缺陷,经研究分析发现“原因自由行为”能更为科学有效地解决醉态行为人刑事责任承担的问题,因此提出在我国犯罪构成理论框架的基础上吸收“原因自由行为”理论中的合理之处的建议,即根据醉态行为人陷入醉态的主观心理,分类讨论醉态行为人的责任能力状况。最后,根据重新构建的醉态理论,对《刑法》总则以及分则中醉态相关立法提出自己的修改建议。
[Abstract]:In today's world, the phenomenon that the perpetrator is in a drunken state to violate the legal interests is not uncommon. There are different regulations on criminal liability of the drunk actor in various countries, and there are differences in theory. Our country only prescribes the penalty of drunken person in the legislation, and does not carry on the clear definition to the "drunken state". This brings a lot of confusion to the investigation of criminal liability after drunken state in judicial practice. Therefore, it is of practical significance to carry out the theoretical research on drunken state including alcohol, drugs and drugs, and to perfect the relevant legislation of drunken state in our country. By using relevant knowledge of medicine, psychiatry and psychology, the concept of drunken state is defined and its characteristics are summed up. Then, the article combs the reason free behavior in the continental law system in detail, and expounds the main contents and defects of the drunk state theory such as "three bases theory" and "strict liability theory" in our country. Through research and analysis, it is found that "the cause of free action" can more scientifically and effectively solve the problem of criminal liability of drunk behavior. Therefore, on the basis of the theoretical framework of the constitution of crime in our country, it is proposed to absorb the reasonable place in the theory of "free action of reason", that is to say, according to the subjective psychology of drunken actor falling into drunken state, the author classifies and discusses the responsibility ability of drunken actor. Finally, according to the theory of reconstructing drunken state, the author puts forward some suggestions to amend the general rules of Criminal Law and the relevant legislation of drunken state in the specific provisions.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
本文编号:2172840
[Abstract]:In today's world, the phenomenon that the perpetrator is in a drunken state to violate the legal interests is not uncommon. There are different regulations on criminal liability of the drunk actor in various countries, and there are differences in theory. Our country only prescribes the penalty of drunken person in the legislation, and does not carry on the clear definition to the "drunken state". This brings a lot of confusion to the investigation of criminal liability after drunken state in judicial practice. Therefore, it is of practical significance to carry out the theoretical research on drunken state including alcohol, drugs and drugs, and to perfect the relevant legislation of drunken state in our country. By using relevant knowledge of medicine, psychiatry and psychology, the concept of drunken state is defined and its characteristics are summed up. Then, the article combs the reason free behavior in the continental law system in detail, and expounds the main contents and defects of the drunk state theory such as "three bases theory" and "strict liability theory" in our country. Through research and analysis, it is found that "the cause of free action" can more scientifically and effectively solve the problem of criminal liability of drunk behavior. Therefore, on the basis of the theoretical framework of the constitution of crime in our country, it is proposed to absorb the reasonable place in the theory of "free action of reason", that is to say, according to the subjective psychology of drunken actor falling into drunken state, the author classifies and discusses the responsibility ability of drunken actor. Finally, according to the theory of reconstructing drunken state, the author puts forward some suggestions to amend the general rules of Criminal Law and the relevant legislation of drunken state in the specific provisions.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙运梁;;醉酒人犯罪刑事责任的立法比较与法理分析[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
2 付立庆;论生理醉酒犯罪的刑事责任——比较、分梳与改造[J];法律与医学杂志;2002年02期
3 赵秉志;;论原因自由行为中实行行为的着手问题[J];法学杂志;2008年05期
4 黄晶;;从醉酒犯罪刑事责任论原因自由行为——对范某故意伤害和杀人案的刑事责任研究[J];广州市公安管理干部学院学报;2008年03期
5 王晶;;我国犯罪构成理论评析[J];贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年05期
6 赖早兴;;美国刑事法中的能力减弱辩护制度及其启示[J];法商研究;2012年05期
7 林思婷;;浅论醉态形式的分类[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年01期
8 胡雪萍;论醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任[J];湖北警官学院学报;2004年03期
9 李润华;;“醉酒人”犯罪负担刑事责任的依据与判断[J];中国检察官;2012年12期
10 劳娃;论我国刑法中的严格责任[J];上海公安高等专科学校学报;2003年02期
本文编号:2172840
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2172840.html