海峡两岸腐败犯罪的资产追回机制探究
发布时间：2018-08-08 21:19
【摘要】：海峡两岸日益频繁的交流合作在某种程度上为贪官外逃与腐败资产转移提供了路径,为当前反腐的顺利推行带来现实障碍。海峡两岸已有的两个司法互助协议有其局限性,对两岸外逃贪官的腐败资产追回机制欠缺规范应对。基于此,我们应当厘清海峡两岸贪腐资产追回与返还在刑事立法和司法协助方面的现实瓶颈,以地域管辖、有效惩治、防范犯罪与保障人权为原则,通过多元方式完善司法协助与赃款追回机制,为海峡两岸共同惩治贪污腐败提供法治前提与规范基础,从而顺利推进反腐实践的深入发展。
[Abstract]:The increasingly frequent exchanges and cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to some extent provide a path for corrupt officials to flee and transfer corrupt assets, and bring practical obstacles to the smooth implementation of anti-corruption. The two mutual legal assistance agreements between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have their limitations and lack of standard response to the corrupt asset recovery mechanism of the corrupt officials on both sides of the strait. Based on this, we should clarify the practical bottlenecks in criminal legislation and mutual legal assistance in the recovery and return of corrupt assets on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and take the principles of territorial jurisdiction, effective punishment, crime prevention and protection of human rights as the principles. To improve the mechanism of mutual legal assistance and recovery of stolen funds through multiple ways, to provide the premise of rule of law and normative foundation for the cross-straits joint punishment of corruption and corruption, so as to smoothly promote the in-depth development of anti-corruption practice.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：西南政法大学法学院2014级研究生科研创新重点项目“法治反腐与境外追逃追赃机制的改革路径探寻”(FXY2014ZD05)
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2173068
[Abstract]:The increasingly frequent exchanges and cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to some extent provide a path for corrupt officials to flee and transfer corrupt assets, and bring practical obstacles to the smooth implementation of anti-corruption. The two mutual legal assistance agreements between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have their limitations and lack of standard response to the corrupt asset recovery mechanism of the corrupt officials on both sides of the strait. Based on this, we should clarify the practical bottlenecks in criminal legislation and mutual legal assistance in the recovery and return of corrupt assets on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and take the principles of territorial jurisdiction, effective punishment, crime prevention and protection of human rights as the principles. To improve the mechanism of mutual legal assistance and recovery of stolen funds through multiple ways, to provide the premise of rule of law and normative foundation for the cross-straits joint punishment of corruption and corruption, so as to smoothly promote the in-depth development of anti-corruption practice.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：西南政法大学法学院2014级研究生科研创新重点项目“法治反腐与境外追逃追赃机制的改革路径探寻”(FXY2014ZD05)
【分类号】：D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵秉志;;海峡两岸共同打击犯罪问题新探讨[J];江海学刊;2014年01期
2 阴剑峰;海峡两岸商标犯罪立法比较[J];中华商标;2000年06期
3 庄乾龙;安文霞;;海峡两岸遗弃罪之比较[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2007年02期
4 高通;;海峡两岸遣返刑事犯或刑事嫌疑犯的困境和范围[J];政法学刊;2013年04期
5 陈光中;田力男;;海峡两岸刑事管辖冲突及解决路径[J];法学杂志;2010年03期
6 范忠信;;海峡两岸法律互斥及其出路[J];法制现代化研究;2000年00期
7 林雪标;周孙章;;类型化视野下海峡两岸刑事立法比较与借鉴[J];海峡法学;2012年04期
8 王宝来;海峡两岸淫秽犯罪新论[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年02期
9 徐剑;;海峡两岸遗弃罪比较研究[J];福建警察学院学报;2013年01期
10 杨景镇;海峡两岸贿赂罪立法比较研究──兼谈大陆贿赂罪立法的完善[J];检察理论研究;1994年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙颖;海峡两岸罪犯移管制度之研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
，本文编号：2173068
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2173068.html
