“流量劫持”的刑法规制及完善
发布时间：2018-08-12 15:51
【摘要】：通过民事手段规制"流量劫持"行为,可以保护用户自主使用权和市场正常经营秩序。"流量劫持"严重破坏网络安全,应当入罪处罚,可能构成非法控制计算机信息系统罪、破坏计算机信息系统罪以及破坏生产经营罪。提供"流量劫持"技术或帮助实施"流量劫持"也涉嫌构成犯罪。"流量劫持"兼具非法控制和破坏行为的属性,导致罪名之间出现竞合。对此,应当通过立法扩大法益范围与优化行为类型加以化解,司法解释和案例指导制度可以辅助解决。
[Abstract]:The regulation of "traffic hijacking" by civil means can protect the users' right to use independently and the normal operation order of the market. " Traffic hijacking "serious damage to network security, should be punished, may constitute illegal control of the computer information system crime, damage to computer information system crime and destruction of production and operation crimes." The provision of "flow hijacking" technology or assistance in the implementation of "traffic hijacking" is also suspected of constituting an offence. " Traffic hijacking has the attributes of illegal control and sabotage, which leads to a competition between charges. To solve this problem, we should expand the scope of legal interest and optimize the types of behavior through legislation, judicial interpretation and case guidance system can be assisted to solve the problem.
【作者单位】： 华南理工大学法学院;华南理工大学互联网法律研究中心;
【基金】：2015年度最高人民检察院理论研究所重点课题《检察机关对行政执法活动的监督》(课题编号:GJ2015B02)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2179529
[Abstract]:The regulation of "traffic hijacking" by civil means can protect the users' right to use independently and the normal operation order of the market. " Traffic hijacking "serious damage to network security, should be punished, may constitute illegal control of the computer information system crime, damage to computer information system crime and destruction of production and operation crimes." The provision of "flow hijacking" technology or assistance in the implementation of "traffic hijacking" is also suspected of constituting an offence. " Traffic hijacking has the attributes of illegal control and sabotage, which leads to a competition between charges. To solve this problem, we should expand the scope of legal interest and optimize the types of behavior through legislation, judicial interpretation and case guidance system can be assisted to solve the problem.
【作者单位】： 华南理工大学法学院;华南理工大学互联网法律研究中心;
【基金】：2015年度最高人民检察院理论研究所重点课题《检察机关对行政执法活动的监督》(课题编号:GJ2015B02)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2179529
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2179529.html
