“口袋罪”的应然态度和限制进路

发布时间：2018-08-16 19:32

【摘要】：口袋罪问题是我国刑法立法论和教义学中的一个兼具重点和难点的问题,但遗憾的是我国学界和实务界似乎对其有些偏见,关注自然不多。我国口袋罪兼具正负价值,口袋罪弹性过大,内容过广,打击面过大,造成司法混乱,严重威胁罪刑法定原则实现,但是口袋罪也具有一些不容忽视的正面价值和积极意义,口袋罪同样不能用来嘲笑和讥讽。我国口袋罪应当确立适当的哲理基础,口袋罪立法时必须尽可能顺应民意,口袋罪刑法规制要遵循罪刑法定和谦抑性原则,立法和司法都应当严格抑制口袋罪名的产生、扩张乃至异化,避免与非犯罪化相抵牾。并且分别针对具体口袋罪,围绕立法上"小口袋化"和在司法实践中"去口袋化"提出口袋罪限制路径的个性化建议。
[Abstract]:Pocket crime is an important and difficult problem in the legislative theory and dogmology of criminal law in our country, but unfortunately, there seems to be some prejudice against it in the academic and practical circles of our country, and there is not much concern about it. Pocket crime in China has both positive and negative value. Pocket crime has too much flexibility, too wide content, too large scope of attack, resulting in judicial confusion and serious threat to the realization of the principle of legality. However, pocket crime also has some positive value and positive significance that can not be ignored. Pocket sin can also not be used for ridicule and sarcasm. In our country, we should establish an appropriate philosophical basis for pocket crime. When we legislate pocket crime, we must conform to the public opinion as much as possible. The criminal law regulation of pocket crime should follow the principle of criminal law and modesty, and both legislation and judicature should strictly restrain the occurrence of pocket crime. Expand and even dissimilate, avoid contradiction with decriminalization. According to the specific pocket crime, the author puts forward the individualized suggestion of restricting the path of pocket crime around the legislation of "small pocket" and the judicial practice of "removing pocket".
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目“行政刑法新论”(项目编号:13FFX004) 苏州大学卓越人才计划“学术新人奖”基金项目“行政刑法的发展现状及未来走向”(项目编号:5832002413)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】