暴力行为实施后取财行为研究

发布时间：2018-08-17 16:03

【摘要】：关于行为人以暴力、胁迫等方式取得他人财物的行为无论是在司法实践和理论上都不存在争议,但是当被害人被杀死之后行为人取财或者在其他暴力性犯罪后临时起意取得被害人财物的认定却存在着较大的争议。理论界存在着抢劫罪、盗窃罪、侵占罪、抢夺罪各种学说,可谓是百家争鸣。在司法实践中最高人民法院做出了相关的司法解释,对暴力行为后临时起意取得他人财物的行为进行了认定,平息了司法实践中的争议,但其是否合理却值得商榷。笔者从解释论的角度出发,对抢劫罪、盗窃罪、侵占罪几个罪名进行本质上的分析,明确了作为各个罪名所必须具备的构成要件以及构成要件之间的逻辑关系。在此基础上得出构成抢劫罪其非法占有目的这一不成文的构成要件要素必须产生于暴力行为结束之前,当行为人的暴力行为结束后,其临时起意取财行为根据不同的取财地点则应当认定为盗窃罪、侵占罪、或者抢夺罪。
[Abstract]:There is no dispute as to the behavior of the perpetrator who acquires the property of others by means of violence, coercion, etc., whether in judicial practice or in theory, But when the victim is killed after the perpetrator takes money or in other violent crimes after the temporary decision to obtain the victim property but there is a greater controversy. There are theories of robbery, larceny, embezzlement and robbery in the theoretical circle, which can be described as a hundred schools of thought contending. In the judicial practice, the Supreme people's Court has made the relevant judicial explanation, confirmed the act of obtaining other people's property temporarily after the violent act, settled the dispute in the judicial practice, but whether it is reasonable or not is open to question. From the angle of explanation, the author analyzes the crimes of robbery, larceny and embezzlement in essence, and clarifies the constitutive elements which must be possessed as each charge and the logical relationship between them. On this basis, it is concluded that the unwritten elements of the unwritten elements constituting the purpose of illegal possession of the crime of robbery must be produced before the end of the violent act, when the perpetrator's violent act is over, According to different places, it should be regarded as larceny, embezzlement, or snatch.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】