论强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志罪

发布时间：2018-08-18 19:00

【摘要】：强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志罪是《刑法修正案(九)》中新设的一个罪名,它是我国对近几年恐怖主义和极端主义活动猖獗、社会公共安全和社会稳定受到严重挑战的现实回应,同时也是我国坚决严厉地、彻底地打击恐怖主义和极端主义政策在《刑法》中的直接体现。然而,法学领域的新制度或者新规范在诞生之初,往往会遭遇种种质疑和挑战,这就需要通过对其正当性和可操作性的理论阐释,从而进一步推动其在具体实践中更好地发挥现实效用。本文以本罪设立的现实社会背景为前提,在第一部分主要论述强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志行为入罪的根据。该部分首先从理论基础、现实需要和国外经验三个方面具体论证了强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志行为入罪的正当性。其次,通过学界对政策性立法治标不治本、违背刑法谦抑性原则普遍性质疑的回应,更进一步证明了该行为入罪的正当性。第二部分主要论述强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志罪的犯罪构成。该部分通过对本罪客体、客观方面、主体、主观方面的认定,全面分析了本罪的基本条件。此外,通过对本罪中“强制”、“服饰”和“标志”等相关术语基本内涵的解读,以及对“宣扬”和“穿戴”的认定、“恐怖主义”与“极端主义”的区别与联系等相关问题的具体探讨,初步阐发了本罪司法适用的基础。第三部分主要论述强制穿戴宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义服饰、标志罪的司法适用问题。该部分首先明确本罪与强迫劳动罪、侮辱罪、非法剥夺公民宗教信仰自由罪之间的界限。其次通过对犯罪既遂的认定研究了本罪的犯罪形态问题。再次从直接强制和间接强制两个方面讨论了本罪的共同犯罪问题。然后通过引用教学案例并加以系统分析,具体说明了本罪可能出现的想象竞合与法条竞合,这为解决司法实践中可能遇到的难题提供初步的理论参考。最后对本罪刑罚的相关问题进行了阐发:其一,对我国公民犯本罪者,应该明确是否应当剥夺政治权利;其二,本罪的提出是出于对恐怖主义、极端主义危害的国际性以及我国履行国际义务的考虑,应当明确对于外国人犯本罪者,是否可以适用驱逐出境。
[Abstract]:The crime of compulsory wearing of propaganda of terrorism, extremist clothing and symbols is a newly established crime in the Criminal Law Amendment (9). It is a rampant crime against terrorism and extremist activities in our country in recent years. The realistic response to the serious challenge to social public security and social stability is also the direct embodiment of our country's resolute and thorough policy of combating terrorism and extremism in the Criminal Law. However, at the beginning of the birth of the new system or new norm in the field of law, it is often met with a variety of questions and challenges, which requires the theoretical interpretation of its legitimacy and maneuverability. In order to further promote its practical practice to play a better role. On the premise of the social background of the crime, the first part mainly discusses the basis of compulsory wearing of propaganda of terrorism, extremist clothing, symbol of the crime. In this part, the author firstly demonstrates the legitimacy of compulsory wearing of propaganda of terrorism, extremist dress and symbol behavior from three aspects: theoretical basis, practical needs and foreign experience. Secondly, through the academic circles to the policy legislation not the root cause, violates the criminal law modesty principle universal challenge response, has further proved this behavior to convict the legitimacy. The second part mainly discusses the criminal constitution of the crime of promoting terrorism, extremist dress and symbol. This part comprehensively analyzes the basic conditions of this crime through the identification of the object, objective, subjective and subjective aspects of the crime. In addition, through the interpretation of the basic connotation of the relevant terms such as "compulsion", "dress" and "logo" in this crime, as well as the identification of "propaganda" and "wear", This paper discusses the difference and relation between terrorism and extremism, and expounds the basis of judicial application of this crime. The third part mainly discusses the judicial application of the crime of promoting terrorism, extremist dress and symbol. This part firstly clarifies the boundary between this crime and the crime of forced labor, insulting crime and illegally depriving citizens of their freedom of religious belief. Secondly, it studies the form of crime through the cognizance of crime accomplishment. The joint crime of this crime is discussed from two aspects of direct coercion and indirect compulsion. Then by quoting teaching cases and analyzing them systematically, it explains the possibility of imaginative concurrence and law concurrence, which provides a preliminary theoretical reference for solving the problems that may be encountered in judicial practice. In the end, the related problems of the penalty of this crime are explained: first, it should be clear whether the citizens of our country should be deprived of their political rights; second, this crime is proposed out of terrorism. Considering the internationality of extremism and our country's fulfillment of international obligations, it should be made clear whether expulsion can be applied to foreigners who commit this crime.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】