盗窃网络虚拟财产的法律定性研究

发布时间：2018-08-26 09:30

【摘要】：互联网技术的飞速发展催生出各种各样的新事物,网络虚拟财产就是其中之一。然而新事物的发展过程总是曲曲折折,不例外的也包括网络虚拟财产,从最早的中国网络游戏第一案“红月案”到近年的“浮云”木马盗窃案,以盗窃虚拟货币、游戏装备、点卡等各类网络盗窃犯罪案件层出不穷。然而由于法律的滞后性,关于网络虚拟财产的立法在我国法律中现在仍处于空白状态。为了完善这个法律缺口,我们必须大力的对网络虚拟财产进行深入的研究,从而使法律保护体系中的网络虚拟财产保护制度更加完善。本文将通过分析我国的立法及司法现状,借鉴其他国家和地区的经验,针对现有的关于盗窃网络虚拟财产的定性问题提出完善建议。全文共分四个部分,脉络体系如下:第一部分:导论。具体分析了选题背景和研究意义,通过对网络虚拟财产的理论研究和分析,可以解决盗窃网络虚拟财产适用法律的困惑问题,可以为我国适用现有盗窃罪刑法体系说提供理论上的依据。第二部分:系统性地论述了当前对于盗窃网络虚拟财产行为的定性的现状,主要有三种定性之争:按侵犯通信自由罪定罪处罚;按非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪定罪处罚;按盗窃罪定罪处罚。第三部分:针对盗窃罪对象的财产属性,论述了网络虚拟财产符合盗窃罪对象的三种财产属性,进而可以针对盗窃网络虚拟财产的行为定性为盗窃罪。第四部分:对美韩、德日、我国台湾和香港地区关于盗窃网络虚拟财产法制经验作了总结归纳,在全面分析我国盗窃网络虚拟财产的法制现状的基础上,创设性提出健全我国网络虚拟财产的刑法保护之构想。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of Internet technology spawned a variety of new things, network virtual property is one of them. However, the development process of new things is always twists and turns, including the network virtual property, from the first Chinese online game case "Red Moon case" to the recent "floating Cloud" Trojan theft case, in order to steal virtual currency and game equipment. Point card and other types of network theft crime cases emerge in endlessly. However, due to the lag of the law, the legislation on the virtual property of network is still in blank state in the law of our country. In order to perfect this legal gap, we must make great efforts to study the network virtual property, so as to make the network virtual property protection system in the legal protection system more perfect. By analyzing the current legislation and judicial situation of our country and drawing on the experience of other countries and regions, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the qualitative problems of theft of virtual property on the Internet. The full text is divided into four parts, the choroid system is as follows: the first part: introduction. Through the theoretical research and analysis of the virtual property of the network, we can solve the confusion of the law applicable to the theft of the virtual property of the network. It can provide theoretical basis for the application of the existing criminal law system of larceny in our country. The second part: systematically discusses the current situation of the nature of the theft of network virtual property, there are three types of qualitative argument: the crime of infringing on the freedom of communication, the crime of illegal acquisition of computer information system data conviction punishment; Be convicted and punished for larceny. The third part: in view of the property attribute of the object of larceny, the paper discusses that the virtual property of the network accords with the three kinds of property attribute of the object of larceny, and then the behavior of stealing the virtual property of the network can be characterized as the crime of larceny. The fourth part summarizes the legal experience of theft of virtual property in America, Korea, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong, on the basis of comprehensive analysis of the legal status quo of theft of virtual property on the Internet in our country. Creativeness puts forward the idea of perfecting the criminal law protection of network virtual property in our country.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】