论监督过失的限缩:以被允许的危险为视角
发布时间：2018-08-26 14:14
【摘要】：风险社会下监督过失对于责任事故犯罪的预防具有积极意义,但为平衡社会发展与刑法的法益保护机能,监督过失也有适当限缩的必要。被允许的危险作为阻却违法事由具有限缩监督过失的功能。被允许的危险与监督过失的界限应重点通过考察监督者有无违反一定的行为注意规则、危险行为与被侵害法益间的利益衡量及有无履行必要的注意义务来综合认定。被允许的危险理论对于我国监督过失犯罪的刑事立法和司法均具有现实借鉴意义,从而为研究我国监督过失犯罪提供新的思路。
[Abstract]:In the risk society, the supervision fault has positive significance for the prevention of the crime of the accident of responsibility, but in order to balance the social development with the legal interest protection function of the criminal law, it is necessary to limit the supervision fault properly. The permitted danger acts as an impediment to violations of the law with the function of limited oversight negligence. The limits of permissible danger and supervisory negligence should be determined comprehensively by examining whether the supervisor has violated certain rules of attention, the interests between dangerous behavior and infringed legal interests and whether he has fulfilled the necessary duty of care. The permitted hazard theory has practical significance for the criminal legislation and judicial supervision of negligent crime in China, thus providing a new way of thinking for the study of the supervision of negligent crime in our country.
【作者单位】： 广东财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“97刑法以来刑事立法理由的实证分析与反思”(项目编号:15CFX024) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“风险社会中事故型犯罪的监督过失研究”(项目编号:11YJC820136)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1
[Abstract]:In the risk society, the supervision fault has positive significance for the prevention of the crime of the accident of responsibility, but in order to balance the social development with the legal interest protection function of the criminal law, it is necessary to limit the supervision fault properly. The permitted danger acts as an impediment to violations of the law with the function of limited oversight negligence. The limits of permissible danger and supervisory negligence should be determined comprehensively by examining whether the supervisor has violated certain rules of attention, the interests between dangerous behavior and infringed legal interests and whether he has fulfilled the necessary duty of care. The permitted hazard theory has practical significance for the criminal legislation and judicial supervision of negligent crime in China, thus providing a new way of thinking for the study of the supervision of negligent crime in our country.
【作者单位】： 广东财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“97刑法以来刑事立法理由的实证分析与反思”(项目编号:15CFX024) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“风险社会中事故型犯罪的监督过失研究”(项目编号:11YJC820136)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕英杰;;监督过失的客观归责[J];清华法学;2008年04期
2 李蕤宏;;监督过失理论研究[J];刑事法评论;2008年02期
3 刘期湘;;监督过失的概念界定[J];文史博览(理论);2008年06期
4 陈国娟;;监督过失相关问题研究[J];法制与社会;2009年31期
5 王东明;杜辉;;监督过失与共同过失关系论[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年12期
6 王炳宽;;监督过失理论与对策研究[J];法制与社会;2012年29期
7 赵瑞罡,杨庆玖;监督过失论[J];政治与法律;2001年04期
8 彭凤莲;;监督过失责任论[J];法学家;2004年06期
9 王安异;;浅谈监督过失的注意义务[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年06期
10 刘U，
本文编号：2205117
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2205117.html
