我国贪污贿赂犯罪死刑存废问题研究
发布时间:2018-08-27 06:50
【摘要】:早在2011年初,《刑法修正案(八)》的出台就曾引起人们对贪污贿赂犯罪死刑是否正当的辩论。党和国家在十八大之后继续严厉打击贪污腐败犯罪,众多贪腐官员纷纷落马,不乏有人被依法判处死刑。这再次引起了贪污贿赂犯罪死刑存废问题的争论。 目前,针对贪污贿赂犯罪死刑的存废主要有三种观点。第一种观点是主张立即废除贪污贿赂犯罪死刑;第二种观点是主张保持乃至增添贪污贿赂犯罪死刑罪名的数量;第三种观点是主张现阶段暂时保留贪污贿赂犯罪的死刑配置,与此同时,采用严格限制其适用条件、保证死刑程序严格执行的方式,对贪污贿赂犯罪的死刑逐步废除。 笔者基于阶段性保留论的立场来分析贪污贿赂犯罪死刑存废问题。首先,,以目前我国刑法对贪污贿赂犯罪死刑的设置状况为出发点,探讨其产生的原因与存在的问题;其次,通过阐明贪污贿赂犯罪死刑应否存在的几种观点,深入分析现阶段我国应该保留其死刑配置的原因。最后,为了贪污贿赂犯罪死刑更好地被适用,笔者主张发展完善现有的防贪惩腐法律法规,并且充分利用和发展死刑缓期执行制度。
[Abstract]:As early as 2011, the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII) had aroused debate about the death penalty for corruption and bribery. After the 18th National Congress, the Party and the state continued to crack down on corruption and corruption, many corrupt officials have lost their horses, and some have been sentenced to death in accordance with the law. This once again led to the corruption and bribery of the death penalty on the issue of abolition. At present, there are three views on the death penalty for corruption and bribery. The first is to advocate the immediate abolition of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crimes; the second is to maintain or even increase the number of death penalty charges for corruption and bribery crimes; and the third is to maintain the death penalty allocation for corruption and bribery crimes for the time being. At the same time, the death penalty for corruption and bribery is gradually abolished by strictly restricting its application conditions and ensuring the strict execution of the death penalty procedure. Based on the stage reservation theory, the author analyzes the death penalty for corruption and bribery. First of all, from the point of view of the establishment of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crime in the criminal law of our country, this paper discusses the causes and existing problems of the death penalty; secondly, by clarifying whether the death penalty should exist in the crime of corruption and bribery, there are several viewpoints on whether or not the death penalty should exist. Deeply analyze the reason why our country should keep its death penalty allocation at this stage. Finally, in order to better apply the death penalty for corruption and bribery, the author proposes to develop and perfect the existing laws and regulations of corruption prevention and punishment, and to make full use of and develop the system of suspending execution of the death penalty.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392
本文编号:2206460
[Abstract]:As early as 2011, the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII) had aroused debate about the death penalty for corruption and bribery. After the 18th National Congress, the Party and the state continued to crack down on corruption and corruption, many corrupt officials have lost their horses, and some have been sentenced to death in accordance with the law. This once again led to the corruption and bribery of the death penalty on the issue of abolition. At present, there are three views on the death penalty for corruption and bribery. The first is to advocate the immediate abolition of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crimes; the second is to maintain or even increase the number of death penalty charges for corruption and bribery crimes; and the third is to maintain the death penalty allocation for corruption and bribery crimes for the time being. At the same time, the death penalty for corruption and bribery is gradually abolished by strictly restricting its application conditions and ensuring the strict execution of the death penalty procedure. Based on the stage reservation theory, the author analyzes the death penalty for corruption and bribery. First of all, from the point of view of the establishment of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crime in the criminal law of our country, this paper discusses the causes and existing problems of the death penalty; secondly, by clarifying whether the death penalty should exist in the crime of corruption and bribery, there are several viewpoints on whether or not the death penalty should exist. Deeply analyze the reason why our country should keep its death penalty allocation at this stage. Finally, in order to better apply the death penalty for corruption and bribery, the author proposes to develop and perfect the existing laws and regulations of corruption prevention and punishment, and to make full use of and develop the system of suspending execution of the death penalty.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周光权;;《刑法修正案(八)》的深度解读[J];中国司法;2011年05期
2 彭新林;;经济犯罪中死刑生命空间的新思考[J];福建法学;2009年01期
3 孙国祥;;我国惩治贪污贿赂犯罪刑事政策模式的应然选择[J];法商研究;2010年05期
4 曲新久;推动废除死刑:刑法学者的责任[J];法学;2003年04期
5 周永坤;;为反贪贿,应废除贪墨罪死刑[J];法学;2006年08期
6 华学文;;论贪污受贿罪的死刑存废问题[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2011年10期
7 杜华;;贪污贿赂犯罪适用死刑问题研究[J];法制与社会;2008年31期
8 王强军;;死刑不引渡不应成为“倒逼”国内废除死刑的理由[J];华东政法大学学报;2011年04期
9 李炜;;贪污贿赂犯罪死刑制度争议问题研究[J];河北法学;2012年06期
10 王振国;;贪污受贿罪死刑废止的分析[J];青春岁月;2011年16期
本文编号:2206460
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2206460.html