关于故意杀人罪死刑量刑情节的研究

发布时间：2018-08-30 18:16

【摘要】：由于故意杀人罪的罪状表述相对简单、刑罚幅度的设置又比较宽泛,导致故意杀人罪的死刑适用在司法实践中存在量刑失衡等突出问题,不利于实现司法公正。本文重点介绍了各种情节在故意杀人罪死刑案件中的地位和作用,包括法定情节和酌定情节,并选取其中有代表性的部分进行详细分析。联系故意杀人案件的特征,应当对不同的量刑情节进行梳理,并结合当前限制死刑适用的趋势和少杀、慎杀的政策,以达到精确量刑的目标,实现刑法的谦抑性原则。本文分为三个部分。第一部分论证法定情节在故意杀人死刑案件中的适用,包括累犯、共同犯罪、自首和立功情节。第二部分主要分析了酌定情节在故意杀人罪死刑案件中的适用。第三部分指出了量刑情节在故意杀人罪的死刑案件的适用过程中存在的不足并对其完善提出自己的想法。
[Abstract]:Due to the relatively simple description of the crime of intentional homicide and the wide range of punishment, the death penalty of intentional homicide has some outstanding problems, such as the imbalance of sentencing in judicial practice, which is not conducive to the realization of judicial justice. This paper focuses on the status and role of various circumstances in the death penalty cases of intentional homicide, including the statutory circumstances and discretionary circumstances, and select the representative part of the case for detailed analysis. According to the characteristics of intentional homicide cases, different circumstances of sentencing should be combed, and combined with the current trend of restricting the application of the death penalty and the policy of less killing and careful killing, in order to achieve the goal of accurate sentencing and realize the principle of modesty in criminal law. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part demonstrates the application of legal circumstances in death penalty cases, including recidivism, joint crime, surrender and meritorious service. The second part mainly analyzes the application of discretionary circumstances in death penalty cases of intentional homicide. The third part points out the shortcomings of sentencing circumstances in the death penalty cases of intentional homicide and puts forward his own ideas for its perfection.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.34

【相似文献】