论刑法类推解释的第三种立场
发布时间：2018-09-09 13:16
【摘要】：在刑法理论界,关于类推解释有三种观点,分别为否定论、赞成论及第三种立场。第三种立场明确反对类推解释,却利用刑法解释不断在个罪规范上寻求突破,具体路径一般从三个维度展开:用正义代替文义、比较点的改变及引入举轻以明重。若要坚持刑法解释的合理边界,就需要回归文义、正确选择比较点及慎用举重以明轻。诠释规范文义应从文义开始并止于文义,历史解释、体系解释等方法是探寻文义的路径,目的解释是决定文义选择的手段。解释结果是否符合文义可从两个维度进行考察:是否符合词语的通俗用法,是否符合语言的逻辑结构。
[Abstract]:In the field of criminal law theory, there are three views on analogies, namely, negation and discussion of the third position. The third kind of stand is clear against analogy interpretation, but use criminal law interpretation to seek breakthrough in individual crime norm constantly, the concrete path generally starts from three dimensions: using justice to replace the meaning of literature, the change of comparison point and the introduction of light to light with light weight. If we want to insist on the reasonable boundary of criminal law interpretation, we need to return to the meaning of the text, choose the right point of comparison and use weight lifting carefully to lighten the light. The interpretation of normative meaning should begin with the meaning of the text and stop at the meaning of the text, historical interpretation, system interpretation and other methods are the way to explore the meaning of text, the purpose of interpretation is the means to decide the choice of the meaning of the text. Whether the interpretation results accord with the meaning of text can be examined from two dimensions: whether they accord with the popular usage of words and whether they conform to the logical structure of language.
【作者单位】： 上海政法学院刑事司法学院;
【基金】：上海市曙光计划项目(16SG52) 上海政法学院项目(GH16042)
【分类号】：D924.1
，
本文编号：2232487
[Abstract]:In the field of criminal law theory, there are three views on analogies, namely, negation and discussion of the third position. The third kind of stand is clear against analogy interpretation, but use criminal law interpretation to seek breakthrough in individual crime norm constantly, the concrete path generally starts from three dimensions: using justice to replace the meaning of literature, the change of comparison point and the introduction of light to light with light weight. If we want to insist on the reasonable boundary of criminal law interpretation, we need to return to the meaning of the text, choose the right point of comparison and use weight lifting carefully to lighten the light. The interpretation of normative meaning should begin with the meaning of the text and stop at the meaning of the text, historical interpretation, system interpretation and other methods are the way to explore the meaning of text, the purpose of interpretation is the means to decide the choice of the meaning of the text. Whether the interpretation results accord with the meaning of text can be examined from two dimensions: whether they accord with the popular usage of words and whether they conform to the logical structure of language.
【作者单位】： 上海政法学院刑事司法学院;
【基金】：上海市曙光计划项目(16SG52) 上海政法学院项目(GH16042)
【分类号】：D924.1
，
本文编号：2232487
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2232487.html
