当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

教唆、帮助自杀行为的刑法学分析

发布时间:2018-09-10 11:07
【摘要】:教唆、帮助自杀的行为在我国目前刑法典中并未作以规定,相对应的只是以“故意杀人罪”抽象性地规定,但是否能将教唆、帮助自杀的行为包含其中仍有疑问。国外许多国家以及我国港澳台地区对该行为都予以单独立法,而我国司法实践做法是以“故意杀人罪”处之,相比之下,我国刑法杀人罪的条款也颇为“简陋”,直接导致教唆、帮助自杀者之行为的定罪量刑成为了相当大的疑问。本文作者首先以自杀的法律性质为切入点,对自杀的违法性进行判断,肯定自杀具备违法性,进而对教唆、帮助自杀行为进行界定。采用比较分析方法,对德国、日本、英美国家学者们的相关观点进行比较,认为教唆、帮助自杀具有违法性。本文第二部分对教唆帮助自杀的可罚性进行理论分析,对于该行为可罚性存在肯定说和否定说两种观点,但两种学说均有不足,笔者将通过综合比较,同意其具备可罚性,但理论依据则不能简单依附于自杀者行为的违法性上,同时,,通过阐述我国实践中对该行为的处罚做法和借鉴国外及我国港澳台地区的法律实践,在第三部分着重阐述完善教唆、帮助自杀立法的必要性,并根据我国现有法律体系进行大胆设计,从罪名、罪状到刑罚,以及情节处罚幅度等方面,既充分借鉴国外立法精要之处,又符合我国基本法律原则和国情政策,作以建议性陈述,希望对今后学者的研究起到抛砖引玉的作用。
[Abstract]:The act of abetting and aiding suicide is not stipulated in the Criminal Code of our country at present, what is corresponding is only the abstract stipulation of "intentional homicide", but whether the act of abetting or aiding suicide can be included in it is still doubtful. Many foreign countries, as well as Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions of our country, legislate on this act separately, but the judicial practice of our country is to deal with the crime of "intentional homicide". In contrast, the terms of the crime of homicide in criminal law of our country are also quite "simple". The conviction and sentencing of the direct cause of abetting and aiding suicide has become a considerable question. In this paper, the author starts with the legal nature of suicide, judges the illegality of suicide, affirms the illegality of suicide, and then defines the act of abetting and aiding suicide. By using the method of comparative analysis, this paper compares the views of scholars in Germany, Japan and the United States and thinks that abetting and aiding suicide are illegal. In the second part of this paper, the author makes a theoretical analysis of the penalization of aiding suicide. There are positive and negative views on the behavior's penalization, but the two theories are deficient. The author will agree that the behavior is punishable by comprehensive comparison. However, the theoretical basis cannot be simply attached to the illegality of suicide behavior. At the same time, by expounding the punishment of this act in our country's practice and drawing lessons from foreign countries and the legal practice of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in our country, In the third part, it focuses on the necessity of perfecting abetting and helping suicide legislation, and makes bold design according to the existing legal system of our country, from the charge, the crime to the penalty, and the extent of the punishment of the circumstances, and so on. It not only draws lessons from the foreign legislative essentials, but also conforms to the basic legal principles and national policies of our country, and makes a constructive statement, hoping to serve as an inspiration to the future research of scholars.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D914

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 胡海;;论教唆他人自杀的犯罪性来源[J];福建警察学院学报;2008年03期

2 冯军;刑法的规范化诠释[J];法商研究;2005年06期

3 张明楷;论刑法的谦抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年04期

4 张永红;吴茵;;教唆自杀新论[J];法学杂志;2011年01期

5 沈玉忠;;教唆他人自杀行为的定性与理性分析[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年04期

6 冯凡英;教唆、帮助自杀行为刍议[J];人民检察;2004年02期

7 陈兴良;共同犯罪论[J];现代法学;2001年03期

8 何彩萍;教唆、帮助他人自杀独立定罪的法理探析[J];榆林学院学报;2005年02期

9 陈兴良;教唆或者帮助他人自杀行为之定性研究——邵建国案分析[J];浙江社会科学;2004年06期



本文编号:2234269

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2234269.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ade0e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com