侮辱罪司法认定问题研究
[Abstract]:The new Criminal Law Amendment IX in 2016 has amended the crime of insult, adding a new part of the crime of insulting the victim through the use of the Internet, and the difficulty of adducing libel can be assisted by the judicial authorities. The "overt" in the standard of incrimination of insult is not limited to visual seeing, and hearing can also be a kind of overt. The scope of overt should be wider in reasonable circumstances, but it should be based on the overt of result. "serious circumstances" is based on the determination of the adverse consequences of their actions, which should be more physiological and pathological, rather than the result of a state of mind that the victim considers unable to face others. The object of insult is divided into "corpse", "infant and severe psychopath" and "unit" to discuss the crime of insult, mainly from the point of view of social evaluation and external reputation, and these subjects should be included in the object of the crime of insult. The crime of insulting includes verbal insult, action insult, network insult, among which the Internet insult is the new insult of contemporary society, and it is also the focus of this paper. The determination of joint crime of insult includes aider, abettor and indirect principal, which should be judged according to the theory of general theory. For the crime of insulting, the form of cessation includes the form of preparation, the form of suspension, the form of attempt, the form of the practice of behavior corresponding to the theory of the general theory to judge, but the act of verbal insult does not exist in the preparatory stage. When there is a verbal insult, the crime is accomplished. The distinction and competition between insulting crime and libel crime and compulsory indecent assault are compared and summarized from ways, social harm degree, gender and so on.
【学位授予单位】:广西民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘硕;;网络共同犯罪语境下帮助犯问题的解决路径[J];湖北函授大学学报;2016年03期
2 张娜;韩世远;;作者、新闻出版单位与死者名誉保护——以《最高人民法院公报》案例为素材[J];法律适用;2008年10期
3 刘国涛;死者生前人格利益民法保护的法理基础——读《死者生前人格利益的民法保护》后的再思考[J];比较法研究;2004年04期
4 曹诗权,郭静;论网络侵权[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2003年01期
5 葛云松;死者生前人格利益的民法保护[J];比较法研究;2002年04期
6 董炳和;论死者名誉的法律保护[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年02期
7 麻昌华;论死者名誉的法律保护——兼与杨立新诸先生商榷[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1996年06期
8 陈信勇;论对死者生命痕迹的法律保护——兼与孙加锋同志商榷[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);1992年03期
9 赵秉志 ,李志增;诽谤罪若干疑难问题研讨[J];法学评论;1992年03期
10 陈正云;死者可以作为侮辱罪诽谤罪的对象[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);1991年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李军辉;网络环境中的诽谤罪研究[D];华南理工大学;2014年
2 焦东杰;强制猥亵、侮辱妇女罪探析[D];郑州大学;2013年
3 吴艳林;网络实名制下侵权行为的法律规制[D];中南民族大学;2013年
4 李遥;论我国侮辱罪中的侮辱行为[D];湘潭大学;2012年
,本文编号:2247509
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2247509.html