“美丽中国”目标实现中的刑法短板及其克服

发布时间：2018-10-09 13:47

【摘要】：为了克服环境污染治理中的刑法短板,应坚持解释论与立法论"两手抓"。环境刑法保护的法益是环境本身,而非传统的人身、财产法益;环境法益不同于公共安全法益,故意排污并不符合投放危险物质罪的构成要件;无论故意排污还是因管理不善过失导致环境污染,都应作为犯罪处罚,故"模糊罪过说"具有现实合理性;污染环境罪属于一种准抽象危险犯,"严重污染环境"是对排污行为本身的限制;安装"天网"同时捕获普通野生动物和珍贵野生动物的,应当数罪并罚;多年后方显现污染后果的,并未超过污染环境罪情节加重犯追诉时效。应将环境犯罪作为独立一章进行规定,置于危害公共安全罪章节之后;应根据不同的环境要素对污染环境罪进行分解;应将污染环境罪法定最高刑提升至十五年有期徒刑。
[Abstract]:In order to overcome the shortcomings of criminal law in environmental pollution control, we should insist on the theory of interpretation and legislation. The legal interests of the environmental criminal law protection are the environment itself, not the traditional personal and property law interests, the environmental law benefits are different from the public safety law interests, and the intentional discharge of pollutants does not accord with the constitutive requirements of the crime of putting in dangerous substances. Whether the pollution is caused by intentional pollution or by mismanagement, it should be punished as a crime, so "fuzzy crime theory" has realistic rationality. The crime of polluting the environment belongs to one kind of quasi-abstract dangerous crime, "seriously pollute the environment" is the restriction to the discharge behavior itself; if installing "Skynet" to catch common wild animals and precious wild animals at the same time, it should be punished in combination of several crimes; For many years, the consequence of pollution has not exceeded the limitation of prosecution for aggravating circumstances of environmental pollution crime. Environmental crime should be defined as a separate chapter after the chapter on crimes against public safety; environmental pollution crime should be decomposed according to different environmental elements; the maximum statutory penalty of environmental pollution crime should be promoted to fifteen years imprisonment.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题“污染环境罪适用研究”(项目编号:CLS(2016)D52)的研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】