当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

论刑法刑事政策化

发布时间:2018-10-10 15:55
【摘要】:刑法刑事政策化,意在强调刑事政策对刑法体系的作用力以及刑法体系对刑事政策的反作用力。与其认为刑事政策化是一种理论言说,毋宁说,刑法刑事政策化是实然层面各国正在共同经历的一个过程。 该命题的核心在于正确处理好刑事政策与刑法体系的关系。德国刑法学发展史为我们提供了两种方式选择:李斯特分离式与罗克辛合一式,并且以实践经验向我们展示了合一式的巨大潜能。在全球化背景下,人们生活方式高度趋同,现代社会矛盾在不同国家高度相似。尚处于前法治时代的中国没有机会再倒回李斯特的时代原点进行一场漫长演进,只能立足当下,吸收德国刑法学发展成果进行一场百年跨越。正确认识分析目的理性刑法体系,结合本土资源进行中国化改造,寻求适合中国刑法刑事政策化的道路,正是本文意旨所在。
[Abstract]:The criminal policy of criminal law is intended to emphasize the influence of criminal policy on criminal law system and the reaction force of criminal law system to criminal policy. Instead of thinking that the criminal policy is a theoretical statement, it is rather that the criminal policy of criminal law is a process that all countries are going through. The core of this proposition lies in correctly handling the relation between criminal policy and criminal law system. The history of criminal law in Germany provides us with two ways to choose: Liszt split and Roxin, and shows us the great potential of Oneness with practical experience. Under the background of globalization, people's lifestyles are highly convergent, and modern social contradictions are highly similar in different countries. China, which is still in the pre-rule of law era, has no chance to go back to Liszt's origin for a long evolution, only to base itself on the present and absorb the achievements of German criminal law development for a hundred years. It is the purpose of this article to correctly understand and analyze the system of rational criminal law, combine with local resources to reform the criminal policy of Chinese criminal law and find a way suitable for the criminal policy of Chinese criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1

【相似文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 蒋宁;论刑法刑事政策化[D];苏州大学;2014年



本文编号:2262377

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2262377.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5436b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com