医闹刑法规制研究
发布时间：2018-10-16 21:25
【摘要】：我国正处于社会转型期,也是各种社会矛盾纠纷的多发期,医闹事件已成为政府和社会关注的焦点问题之一。医闹事件不仅严重影响了医疗秩序的稳定,侵害了医务人员的合法权益,同时也严重阻碍了医疗事业的创新发展与进步。医闹事件之所以屡禁不止,和我国的医疗卫生体制、法律体制的不完善有着密切关系,其中一个重要的原因就是我国现行刑法对医闹行为的规制存在缺陷。2015年《刑法修正案(九)》正式实施,修正案对刑法第二百九十条进行了适度修改,将“医疗”写入该条第一款,明确将医闹行为纳入聚众扰乱社会秩序罪进行规制。但此次修改并未突出保护医务人员的合法权益,修改前后产生的社会效果并不明显,针对频发的医闹事件,强化对医闹的刑法规制势在必行。本文分为四个部分:第一部分,主要阐述医闹行为相关理论,包括医闹的概念、类型、发展态势、成因及危害,为后文深入研究医闹刑法规制打好铺垫;当前理论界对医闹的概念尚未达成共识,笔者认为医闹是指患者及其利害关系人以及受雇于患方的组织或个人,以医疗纠纷为借口,在医疗机构现场滋事、扰乱医疗机构正常秩序或威胁、侵害医务人员及其利害关系人合法权益的危害行为。笔者从刑法的角度出发,将医闹划分为良性医闹和恶性医闹。第二部分,对医闹行为刑法规制必要性和规制现状进行了探讨和梳理,对医闹行为刑法规制的困境进行了分析探究,以使刑法对医闹的规制更有针对性。笔者指出刑法对医闹规制的理论困境和实践困境,在理论上,存在医闹刑法规制原则缺失、医闹刑事立法缺失、保护医务人员的功能缺失、现有罪名对医闹的规制不全面;在实践上,主要是医闹涉嫌相关犯罪之间的适用模糊。第三部分,研究了域外医患纠纷的刑法规制,汲取他国可供借鉴的经验,为我国医闹刑法规制提供参考。笔者认为我国应借鉴国外先进经验,设置专门的罪名规制医闹。第四部分,研究我国医闹刑法规制的完善途径。为更好地解决医闹刑法规制的难题,应坚守刑法谦抑、民行优先适用、宽严相济等基本原则;增设法条界定医闹概念,设立暴力医闹罪,并设置想象竞合犯条款。针对医闹刑法规制的实践困境,需进一步明晰了医闹涉嫌相关犯罪之间的界分,以期为医闹行为的刑法规制提供更为准确的规范标准。
[Abstract]:Our country is in the social transition period, is also the frequent period of all kinds of social contradictions and disputes, the medical incident has become one of the focus issues of the government and the society. The incident not only seriously affects the stability of medical order, infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel, but also hinders the innovation, development and progress of medical cause. The reason why the medical incident has been repeatedly prohibited is closely related to the imperfection of the medical and health system and the legal system in our country. One of the important reasons is that the current criminal law of our country has some defects in the regulation of medical behavior. In 2015, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) was formally implemented, and the amendment made a moderate amendment to Article 290 of the Criminal Law. "Medical treatment" is written into the first paragraph of this article, which explicitly regulates the crime of mass agglomeration and disturbing social order. However, the revision does not highlight the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel, and the social effect before and after the revision is not obvious. In view of the frequent medical incidents, it is imperative to strengthen the criminal law regulation. This article is divided into four parts: the first part mainly expounds the theory of medical noisy behavior, including the concept, type, development situation, causes and hazards, for the further in-depth study of the criminal law of medical trouble; At present, there is no consensus on the concept of "medical noise" in the theoretical circle. The author thinks that "medical noise" refers to patients and their stakeholders, as well as organizations or individuals employed by patients, using medical disputes as an excuse to make trouble at the scene of medical institutions. Endangering the normal order or threat of medical institutions and infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel and their interested parties. From the angle of criminal law, the author divides the medical scene into benign one and malignant one. The second part discusses and combs the necessity and current situation of the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior, and analyzes the predicament of the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior in order to make the regulation of medical-noisy behavior more targeted in the criminal law. The author points out the theoretical and practical dilemmas of the regulation of medical noise in the criminal law. In theory, there are the absence of the principle of the regulation of the criminal law, the absence of the criminal legislation, the absence of the function of protecting the medical personnel, and the incomplete regulation of the existing charges. In practice, it is mainly the application of vagueness between suspected related crimes. In the third part, the author studies the criminal law regulation of doctor-patient disputes in foreign countries, draws lessons from other countries, and provides reference for the regulation of medical-patient disputes in China. The author thinks that our country should draw lessons from foreign advanced experience and set up special charge to regulate medical trouble. The fourth part, studies the perfect way of the criminal law regulation of medical trouble in our country. In order to solve the problem of criminal law regulation, we should stick to the basic principles of the criminal law, such as the restraint of criminal law, the preferential application of civil conduct, the combination of leniency and severity, the addition of law to define the concept of medical-making, the establishment of violent medical-crime, and the establishment of articles of imaginative coopetition. In view of the practical dilemma of the criminal law regulation of medical trouble, it is necessary to further clarify the division between the related crimes, in order to provide a more accurate standard for the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2275672
[Abstract]:Our country is in the social transition period, is also the frequent period of all kinds of social contradictions and disputes, the medical incident has become one of the focus issues of the government and the society. The incident not only seriously affects the stability of medical order, infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel, but also hinders the innovation, development and progress of medical cause. The reason why the medical incident has been repeatedly prohibited is closely related to the imperfection of the medical and health system and the legal system in our country. One of the important reasons is that the current criminal law of our country has some defects in the regulation of medical behavior. In 2015, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) was formally implemented, and the amendment made a moderate amendment to Article 290 of the Criminal Law. "Medical treatment" is written into the first paragraph of this article, which explicitly regulates the crime of mass agglomeration and disturbing social order. However, the revision does not highlight the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel, and the social effect before and after the revision is not obvious. In view of the frequent medical incidents, it is imperative to strengthen the criminal law regulation. This article is divided into four parts: the first part mainly expounds the theory of medical noisy behavior, including the concept, type, development situation, causes and hazards, for the further in-depth study of the criminal law of medical trouble; At present, there is no consensus on the concept of "medical noise" in the theoretical circle. The author thinks that "medical noise" refers to patients and their stakeholders, as well as organizations or individuals employed by patients, using medical disputes as an excuse to make trouble at the scene of medical institutions. Endangering the normal order or threat of medical institutions and infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel and their interested parties. From the angle of criminal law, the author divides the medical scene into benign one and malignant one. The second part discusses and combs the necessity and current situation of the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior, and analyzes the predicament of the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior in order to make the regulation of medical-noisy behavior more targeted in the criminal law. The author points out the theoretical and practical dilemmas of the regulation of medical noise in the criminal law. In theory, there are the absence of the principle of the regulation of the criminal law, the absence of the criminal legislation, the absence of the function of protecting the medical personnel, and the incomplete regulation of the existing charges. In practice, it is mainly the application of vagueness between suspected related crimes. In the third part, the author studies the criminal law regulation of doctor-patient disputes in foreign countries, draws lessons from other countries, and provides reference for the regulation of medical-patient disputes in China. The author thinks that our country should draw lessons from foreign advanced experience and set up special charge to regulate medical trouble. The fourth part, studies the perfect way of the criminal law regulation of medical trouble in our country. In order to solve the problem of criminal law regulation, we should stick to the basic principles of the criminal law, such as the restraint of criminal law, the preferential application of civil conduct, the combination of leniency and severity, the addition of law to define the concept of medical-making, the establishment of violent medical-crime, and the establishment of articles of imaginative coopetition. In view of the practical dilemma of the criminal law regulation of medical trouble, it is necessary to further clarify the division between the related crimes, in order to provide a more accurate standard for the criminal regulation of medical-noisy behavior.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 林宇虹;;“医闹”相关刑事法律问题探析[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年01期
2 仇墨涵;;浅谈聚众扰乱社会秩序罪中的“医闹”及立案标准[J];法制博览;2015年36期
3 雷林静;;从“医闹”入刑谈化解医患纠纷的新思路[J];管理观察;2015年32期
4 章昌志;;“医闹”行为的法律抗制[J];北京警察学院学报;2015年06期
5 章昌志;;强化法律在化解医患纠纷中的权威地位——以“医闹”行为为例[J];江苏警官学院学报;2015年05期
6 袁云;江增强;杨平;魏萱;;山东省某医院“医闹”纠纷原因分析与防范对策探讨[J];中国医学伦理学;2015年01期
7 李娜;卢青;戎文慧;;2006-2013年“医闹”类群体性事件研究论文的调查分析[J];中华医学图书情报杂志;2014年05期
8 张欣;方卫华;;医患冲突群体性事件中政府的角色失当及纠正——以“南平医闹事件”的解决过程为例[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
9 王佳;王伟;程实;;我国医患关系管理的历史进程与未来展望[J];医学与社会;2013年02期
10 栾永;孟华;;医闹种类、特征、危害与成因对策研究[J];医学与哲学(A);2012年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李海良;群体性事件刑法规制研究[D];西南政法大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 徐丹;论中国医疗纠纷诉讼解决机制的完善[D];广西师范大学;2015年
2 王祥清;医院医闹事件应对研究[D];郑州大学;2014年
3 霍瑶;医疗纠纷处理机制研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
4 李宗海;论医患纠纷的法律解决机制[D];安徽医科大学;2013年
5 汪雪;医患纠纷的法律规制研究[D];哈尔滨商业大学;2012年
6 时乐平;治理“医闹”：医疗纠纷的制度根源及其对策[D];复旦大学;2011年
，本文编号：2275672
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2275672.html
