量刑规范化改革视野下的量刑基准研究——以完善《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》规定的量刑步骤为中心

发布时间：2018-10-16 22:45

【摘要】："幅的理论"和"点的理论"是大陆法系刑法学界关于量刑基准的基本理论,二者之间并非不可调和,相反,它们在理论根据、前提、构造和任务四方面具有相同之处。《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》规定的量刑步骤存在某些不足,应当通过调和上述两种各具特色的理论,以"幅的理论"为起点,以"点的理论"为终点,妥善处理责任刑和预防刑之间的关系,进一步推动量刑规范化改革。具体来说,完善量刑步骤的重点应放在准确确定量刑起点而非基准刑上;在确定量刑起点前,应增设确定具体犯罪构成要件对应的法定刑幅度这一前置程序;在确定量刑起点时,应引入刑事判例指导;在确定量刑起点后,应注意拟宣告刑向最终宣告刑的过渡。
[Abstract]:The theory of "amplitude" and "theory of point" are the basic theories of sentencing benchmark in the civil law criminal law field, and they are not irreconcilable between them. On the contrary, they are based on the theoretical basis and premise. There are some deficiencies in the sentencing procedures stipulated in the sentencing guidance on Common crimes, which should be based on the "theory of amplitude" by reconciling the two theories with their own characteristics. With the theory of point as the end point, the relationship between responsibility penalty and prevention penalty should be properly handled, and the reform of sentencing standardization should be further promoted. Specifically, the emphasis of perfecting sentencing steps should be on accurately determining the starting point of sentencing rather than on the standard punishment; before determining the starting point of sentencing, the pre-procedure of determining the legal penalty range corresponding to the constituent elements of a specific crime should be added. In determining the starting point of sentencing, the guidance of criminal precedent should be introduced, and after the determination of the starting point of sentencing, attention should be paid to the transition from the intended sentence to the final one.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年国家留学基金管理委员会国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目A类奖学金(留金发[2011]3005号)的资助
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】