刑法中的组织行为研究
发布时间:2018-10-18 16:30
【摘要】:本文以刑法中的组织行为作为研究对象。考察国内、外组织犯的立法演变及理论现状,不难发现组织犯出现在共犯的法定分类或者狭义共犯的理论探讨两种情形中。在阐述组织犯的构成与责任时,学者们将组织行为作为构成的客观要件与刑事责任认定的客观根据。本文无意否定建立在主客观相统一原则之上的组织犯相关理论的合理性,只是期望通过刑法中组织行为这一新视角,反思现有的组织犯理论,进而探讨实践中关于组织违法或犯罪情形的处理与应对之策。 文章包括五个部分,共计39947字。 第一部分:主要介绍组织犯的立法情况并做一定的评析,提出刑法中的组织行为这一理论范畴;从组织者与被组织者之间的组织关系角度,深入分析刑法中组织行为的内涵与特征,并认为具有相当的人格支配关系的应负刑事责任的法益侵害性是组织行为的本质属性;从不同视角对组织行为进行类型划分。 第二部分:重点分析组织行为的成立条件。客观方面要有相应的组织行为及其结果。组织行为客观上可表现为组建、领导、策划、指挥行为,也可以表现为指使、雇佣、控制行为;客观的组织行为要有相应的实施者,具有资源便利条件的单位可以成为组织行为的实施者;组织行为的实施者主观方面要具有组织他人进行违法或犯罪行为的故意。 第三部分:主要探讨组织行为的实行化。简要地分析实行行为的实质、类型及其与刑法中组织行为的关系;重点探讨我国刑法中组织行为实行化的表现形式。所组织的行为性质分为犯罪行为、违法行为与中性行为;实行行为定型性机能具有相对性,组织行为实行化具有其理论与实践根据。 第四部分:主要分析组织行为的停止形态。从纵向发展看,,组织行为存在既遂与未完成的各种样态。在共犯性的组织行为上坚持共犯从属性的原则,而针对实行性的组织行为则提倡实质的解释。 第五部分:侧重思考组织行为罪数形态中的几个问题:从继续犯视角分析组建、领导犯罪组织行为;组织行为竞合的处理原则;全面评价原则在法定犯罪集团中的组织行为上的运用等。
[Abstract]:This article regards the organization behavior in the criminal law as the research object. It is not difficult to find out that the legal classification of accomplice or the theory of accomplice in narrow sense can be found in the legislative evolution and present situation of domestic and foreign organized crime. In expounding the constitution and responsibility of organizational crime, the scholars regard organizational behavior as the objective element of constitution and the objective basis of the recognition of criminal responsibility. This paper does not intend to deny the rationality of the related theories of organizational crime based on the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity, but hopes to reflect on the existing theories of organizational crime through the new perspective of organizational behavior in criminal law. Then it discusses the handling and countermeasures of the organization illegal or criminal situation in practice. The article consists of five parts, a total of 39947 words. The first part mainly introduces the legislative situation of the organized crime and makes some comments, and puts forward the theory category of the organization behavior in the criminal law, from the angle of the organization relation between the organizer and the organizer, This paper deeply analyzes the connotation and characteristics of organizational behavior in criminal law, and holds that the legal interest infringement of criminal responsibility, which has a considerable relationship of personality dominance, is the essential attribute of organizational behavior, and classifies the organizational behavior from different angles of view. The second part focuses on the analysis of the conditions for the establishment of organizational behavior. Objective aspect should have corresponding organization behavior and its result. Objectively speaking, organizational behavior can be manifested as organizing, leading, planning and directing behavior, as well as directing, employing and controlling behavior; objective organizational behavior should have corresponding implementers, The unit with convenient resources can be the executor of organizational behavior, and the subjective aspect of organizational behavior should have the intention of organizing others to commit illegal or criminal acts. The third part mainly discusses the implementation of organizational behavior. This paper briefly analyzes the essence, types and the relationship between the practice behavior and the organization behavior in the criminal law, and probes into the manifestation of the organization behavior in the criminal law of our country. The nature of the organization's behavior can be divided into criminal behavior, illegal behavior and neutral behavior, and the function of formalizing behavior is relative, and the implementation of organizational behavior has its theoretical and practical basis. The fourth part: mainly analyzes the stop form of the organization behavior. From the perspective of vertical development, organizational behavior has various patterns of accomplished and unfinished. The principle of accomplice is adhered to in the organizational behavior of accomplice, while the interpretation of substance is advocated in view of the practical organizational behavior. The fifth part: focus on thinking about several problems in the number of crimes of organizational behavior: from the perspective of continuing to commit the analysis of the organization, leading the criminal organization, organizational behavior of competing principles of handling; The application of comprehensive evaluation principle in the organizational behavior of statutory criminal groups.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
本文编号:2279707
[Abstract]:This article regards the organization behavior in the criminal law as the research object. It is not difficult to find out that the legal classification of accomplice or the theory of accomplice in narrow sense can be found in the legislative evolution and present situation of domestic and foreign organized crime. In expounding the constitution and responsibility of organizational crime, the scholars regard organizational behavior as the objective element of constitution and the objective basis of the recognition of criminal responsibility. This paper does not intend to deny the rationality of the related theories of organizational crime based on the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity, but hopes to reflect on the existing theories of organizational crime through the new perspective of organizational behavior in criminal law. Then it discusses the handling and countermeasures of the organization illegal or criminal situation in practice. The article consists of five parts, a total of 39947 words. The first part mainly introduces the legislative situation of the organized crime and makes some comments, and puts forward the theory category of the organization behavior in the criminal law, from the angle of the organization relation between the organizer and the organizer, This paper deeply analyzes the connotation and characteristics of organizational behavior in criminal law, and holds that the legal interest infringement of criminal responsibility, which has a considerable relationship of personality dominance, is the essential attribute of organizational behavior, and classifies the organizational behavior from different angles of view. The second part focuses on the analysis of the conditions for the establishment of organizational behavior. Objective aspect should have corresponding organization behavior and its result. Objectively speaking, organizational behavior can be manifested as organizing, leading, planning and directing behavior, as well as directing, employing and controlling behavior; objective organizational behavior should have corresponding implementers, The unit with convenient resources can be the executor of organizational behavior, and the subjective aspect of organizational behavior should have the intention of organizing others to commit illegal or criminal acts. The third part mainly discusses the implementation of organizational behavior. This paper briefly analyzes the essence, types and the relationship between the practice behavior and the organization behavior in the criminal law, and probes into the manifestation of the organization behavior in the criminal law of our country. The nature of the organization's behavior can be divided into criminal behavior, illegal behavior and neutral behavior, and the function of formalizing behavior is relative, and the implementation of organizational behavior has its theoretical and practical basis. The fourth part: mainly analyzes the stop form of the organization behavior. From the perspective of vertical development, organizational behavior has various patterns of accomplished and unfinished. The principle of accomplice is adhered to in the organizational behavior of accomplice, while the interpretation of substance is advocated in view of the practical organizational behavior. The fifth part: focus on thinking about several problems in the number of crimes of organizational behavior: from the perspective of continuing to commit the analysis of the organization, leading the criminal organization, organizational behavior of competing principles of handling; The application of comprehensive evaluation principle in the organizational behavior of statutory criminal groups.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 路军;组织犯概念诸学说介评——从组织犯刑事立法出发的思考[J];当代法学;2005年03期
2 王昭振;赵微;;组织犯:诠释基础、类型与处罚[J];河北法学;2008年10期
3 贾宇;犯罪故意概念的评析与重构[J];法学研究;1996年04期
4 储槐植,汪永乐;再论我国刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法学研究;2000年02期
5 于志刚;;犯罪故意中的认识理论新探[J];法学研究;2008年04期
6 黎宏;;结果无价值论之展开[J];法学研究;2008年05期
7 邓又天,李永升;试论有组织犯罪的概念及其类型[J];法学研究;1997年06期
8 刘雪梅;;论组织犯的中止[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
9 桂梦美,宣学伟;组织犯本体论[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2003年01期
10 赵辉;;略论组织犯的存在范围[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 朱平;刑法实行行为论[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 胡选洪;组织犯研究[D];西南财经大学;2010年
本文编号:2279707
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2279707.html