“自媒体”时代社会影响对量刑作用的反思
发布时间：2018-10-22 17:43
【摘要】：在当今“自媒体”时代,关于社会影响因素对量刑的作用越来越明显,但是其中也出现了不少问题,其一,我国司法解释虽然承认了“恶劣社会影响”介入了量刑情节的合法性,但是从立法的视角来看,关于社会影响因素的法律定位却没有细致规定。其二,由于法律的缺失性规定导致法官可能在审判的过程中背离罪责刑相适应原则,甚至可能这样潜在地增加了法官的量刑自由裁量权,从而导致可能对犯罪分子的量刑存在司法不公正的情况,甚至法官可能迫于社会影响力而选择对犯罪分子处罚量刑适用顶格的刑罚。其三,尽管社会影响对量刑的作用是一把双刃剑,但是由于司法建设的不完整、民众理性的不健全以及理论的缺失,最终社会影响对量刑是弊大于利,而且会对司法实践产生负面问题;最后,笔者分别从立法、司法方面,多角度提出针对社会影响因素作用于量刑的思考,重点是一要从立法上完善社会影响因素的相关界定的法律概念以及从其他方面满足公众对司法的参与需求,二是从司法机关要规制自己的量刑自由裁量权,不能随意受社会影响的意见而放弃理性的法律观来公正判案量刑。
[Abstract]:In today's "self-media" era, the role of social factors in sentencing is becoming more and more obvious, but there are also many problems. Although the judicial interpretation of our country has acknowledged the legality of "bad social influence" intervening in sentencing circumstances, but from the angle of legislation, there are no detailed regulations on the legal orientation of social influence factors. Second, due to the lack of legal provisions, judges may deviate from the principle of the adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment in the course of trial, and may even potentially increase the discretion of the judge in sentencing. As a result, there may be judicial injustice in the sentencing of criminals, and even judges may choose to apply the top punishment to the punishment of criminals under the influence of society. Third, although the role of social influence on sentencing is a double-edged sword, due to the incomplete judicial construction, the imperfect public rationality and the lack of theory, the ultimate social impact on sentencing is more harmful than good. And it will produce negative problems to the judicial practice. Finally, the author puts forward some thoughts on the effect of social influence factors on sentencing from the aspects of legislation and judicature respectively. The focus is to improve the relevant legal concept of social impact factors in legislation and other aspects to meet the needs of the public to participate in the judiciary, the second is from the judicial organs to regulate their own discretion in sentencing, We should not give up the rational view of law in order to judge the case and sentence justice by the opinion of the society at will.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2287864
[Abstract]:In today's "self-media" era, the role of social factors in sentencing is becoming more and more obvious, but there are also many problems. Although the judicial interpretation of our country has acknowledged the legality of "bad social influence" intervening in sentencing circumstances, but from the angle of legislation, there are no detailed regulations on the legal orientation of social influence factors. Second, due to the lack of legal provisions, judges may deviate from the principle of the adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment in the course of trial, and may even potentially increase the discretion of the judge in sentencing. As a result, there may be judicial injustice in the sentencing of criminals, and even judges may choose to apply the top punishment to the punishment of criminals under the influence of society. Third, although the role of social influence on sentencing is a double-edged sword, due to the incomplete judicial construction, the imperfect public rationality and the lack of theory, the ultimate social impact on sentencing is more harmful than good. And it will produce negative problems to the judicial practice. Finally, the author puts forward some thoughts on the effect of social influence factors on sentencing from the aspects of legislation and judicature respectively. The focus is to improve the relevant legal concept of social impact factors in legislation and other aspects to meet the needs of the public to participate in the judiciary, the second is from the judicial organs to regulate their own discretion in sentencing, We should not give up the rational view of law in order to judge the case and sentence justice by the opinion of the society at will.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈景辉;;忠诚于法律的职业伦理——破解法律人道德困境的基本方案[J];法制与社会发展;2016年04期
2 商凤廷;;渎职罪中“造成恶劣社会影响”的司法认定[J];国家检察官学院学报;2016年04期
3 孙笑侠;;“法治中国”的三个问题[J];法制与社会发展;2013年05期
4 胡铭;刘斌;;从公案看涉检舆情应对机制[J];浙江工商大学学报;2012年04期
5 孙锐;;司法裁判考量社会舆论的正当性[J];国家检察官学院学报;2012年02期
6 周晓虹;;自媒体时代:从传播到互播的转变[J];新闻界;2011年04期
7 后宏伟;;对民愤作为酌定量刑情节的分析[J];鸡西大学学报;2010年05期
8 周永坤;;民意审判与审判元规则[J];法学;2009年08期
9 后宏伟;;对一起中学生自杀案件的分析[J];西部法学评论;2008年05期
10 汪明亮;;媒体对定罪量刑活动可能带来负面影响的作用机制[J];现代法学;2006年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 吴吉星;;从立法本意出发 把握“恶劣社会影响”[N];检察日报;2017年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 陈炜;量刑情节研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 全金;论法官量刑自由裁量权的行使[D];吉林大学;2013年
，本文编号：2287864
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2287864.html
