职务犯罪案件判决轻刑化问题研究
发布时间：2018-10-23 15:03
【摘要】：近年来,我们在反腐领域常常听到一个词汇——“职务犯罪”。“职务犯罪”泛指国家公职人员利用职务之便实施的犯罪行为。职务犯罪腐化社会风气,破坏党群关系,侵害人民群众的财产和生命安全,诱发社会矛盾,已经成为影响经济发展和社会和谐稳定的重要因素。随着刑罚轻缓化趋势的发展,职务犯罪案件判决轻刑化问题逐渐凸显出来,通过数据分析显示,在法院审判过程中适用缓刑和免刑的比例过高,也会出现不当认定自首等情节,严重影响了刑法的权威性和统一性,大大降低了“犯罪成本”。这种趋势已经引起了公众的广泛关注,要想彻底处理好反腐败工作就必须解决好职务犯罪案件轻刑化这个问题。 本文着重分析职务犯罪案件轻刑化问题的四个部分,第一部分是文章的绪论,阐述本文的写作背景,目的和意义,进行了研究这一领域的研究综述,还对职务犯罪相关概念进行了界定。 第二部分从职务犯罪的危害性分析其特征,从根源上找到这一问题本质特性,进行有针对性的分析,以此为铺垫引出职务犯罪案件判决轻刑化问题。 第三部分寻找职务犯罪案件判决轻刑化的成因：一是职务犯罪近年来具有的高智能化特点所致,二是立法层面的缺陷,三是司法层面的法官自由裁量权问题,四是法律监督机制的不健全。 第四部分主要是寻找职务犯罪案件判决轻刑化问题的对策,针对第三部分的成因来寻找相应的对策,即从职务犯罪本身,从立法、司法和监督机制方面找到解决的方法和途径。
[Abstract]:In recent years, we often hear a word in the field of corruption-"duty crime." The term "duty crime" refers to a crime committed by a public official by taking advantage of his position. It has become an important factor to affect the economic development and social harmony and stability by corrupting the social ethos destroying the relationship between the Party and the masses infringing on the property and life safety of the people and inducing social contradictions. With the development of penalty mitigation trend, the problem of light punishment in duty crime cases is gradually highlighted. Through data analysis, it is shown that the proportion of probation and exemption in court trials is too high, and there will also be circumstances such as improper identification of surrender, etc. It seriously affects the authority and unity of criminal law and greatly reduces the cost of crime. This trend has aroused widespread public concern, if we want to deal with the anti-corruption work thoroughly, we must solve the problem of light punishment of duty crime cases. The first part is the introduction of the article, which describes the background, purpose and significance of this paper, and summarizes the research in this field. It also defines the concept of duty crime. The second part analyzes its characteristics from the harmfulness of duty crime, finds the essential characteristic of this problem from the root, carries on the pertinence analysis, in order to pave the way to lead to the problem of light punishment in the case of duty crime. The third part is to find the causes of light punishment in duty crime cases: first, because of the high intelligent characteristics of duty crimes in recent years, second, the defects of legislation, third, the judicial level of the issue of discretion of judges. Fourth, the legal supervision mechanism is not perfect. The fourth part is mainly to look for the countermeasures of light punishment in the case of duty crime, aiming at the causes of the third part to find the corresponding countermeasures, that is, from the crime itself, from the legislative, judicial and supervisory mechanisms to find ways and means to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2289597
[Abstract]:In recent years, we often hear a word in the field of corruption-"duty crime." The term "duty crime" refers to a crime committed by a public official by taking advantage of his position. It has become an important factor to affect the economic development and social harmony and stability by corrupting the social ethos destroying the relationship between the Party and the masses infringing on the property and life safety of the people and inducing social contradictions. With the development of penalty mitigation trend, the problem of light punishment in duty crime cases is gradually highlighted. Through data analysis, it is shown that the proportion of probation and exemption in court trials is too high, and there will also be circumstances such as improper identification of surrender, etc. It seriously affects the authority and unity of criminal law and greatly reduces the cost of crime. This trend has aroused widespread public concern, if we want to deal with the anti-corruption work thoroughly, we must solve the problem of light punishment of duty crime cases. The first part is the introduction of the article, which describes the background, purpose and significance of this paper, and summarizes the research in this field. It also defines the concept of duty crime. The second part analyzes its characteristics from the harmfulness of duty crime, finds the essential characteristic of this problem from the root, carries on the pertinence analysis, in order to pave the way to lead to the problem of light punishment in the case of duty crime. The third part is to find the causes of light punishment in duty crime cases: first, because of the high intelligent characteristics of duty crimes in recent years, second, the defects of legislation, third, the judicial level of the issue of discretion of judges. Fourth, the legal supervision mechanism is not perfect. The fourth part is mainly to look for the countermeasures of light punishment in the case of duty crime, aiming at the causes of the third part to find the corresponding countermeasures, that is, from the crime itself, from the legislative, judicial and supervisory mechanisms to find ways and means to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谭志平;;职务犯罪轻刑化问题分析及解决途径[J];法制与社会;2013年17期
2 兰志伟;郑东;;职务犯罪轻刑化问题研究[J];河北法学;2011年12期
3 夏尊文;陈建军;;中国缓刑的法律属性定位与适用取向[J];湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
4 刘俊俊;;刑事司法中的量刑均衡问题——以职务犯罪案件量刑为视角[J];辽宁法治研究;2008年01期
5 康党辉;;渎职犯罪轻刑化问题研究[J];中国检察官;2013年05期
6 熊玉明;;职务犯罪案件轻刑化的实证分析[J];金田(励志);2012年08期
7 牟春雷;赵亚光;;职务犯罪轻刑化问题分析及纠正途径[J];人民检察;2009年05期
8 陈国庆;韩耀元;王文利;;《关于办理职务犯罪案件认定自首、立功等量刑情节若干问题的意见》理解与适用[J];人民检察;2009年07期
9 游伟;;官员“从宽发落”须“依法司法”应对[J];检察风云;2010年24期
10 许存奎;;职务犯罪案件中自首的法律适用[J];人民检察;2013年10期
，本文编号：2289597
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2289597.html
