财产毁损行为的刑法评价问题研究
发布时间：2018-10-24 11:16
【摘要】：在财产犯罪中，毁损财物的行为时有发生，其对财产罪各罪刑法评价所产生的影响自然是不言而喻的。尽管我国刑法规定了故意毁坏财物罪，但显然不能涵盖评价财产犯罪中的所有毁损行为，同时理论界也缺乏相关体系化的论述。有鉴于此，对于被立法与刑法理论所忽略的毁损行为，本文将做以系统的分析与研究，探寻其对财产罪各罪的刑法评价，即对于定罪量刑所产生的影响。从而在梳理毁损行为相关理论的同时，亦明确了各财产犯罪在涉及毁损财物行为等特殊情形时的定性问题。文章分为以下四个部分： 文章第一部分论述有关财产毁损意思的刑法评价问题。梳理有关非法占有目的的学说与争论，并确定财产毁损意思的内涵，即由毁损故意与排除意思组成。并根据行为人主观毁损意思的有无，对行为人偷开他人机动车的行为进行定性。 文章第二部分论述有关财产毁损实行行为的刑法评价问题。本文列举并分析以往关于“毁损”含义的学说争论，同时在以往学说的基础上，提出经过限定了的“本来的用法侵害说”。对于特殊财物、特殊情形的毁损界定，，提供根据财物自身价值，与恢复财物原有状态所付出的经济代价，进行对比判断的方法。并分析了物理、功能性破坏与抛弃、隐匿两类毁损实行行为的表现形式。 文章第三部分论述有关财产毁损对象的刑法评价问题。列举了动物、证券以及违禁品三种特殊行为对象。通过论证分析，得出动物以及资格证券能够成为毁损对象，而股票与违禁品不能成为毁损对象的结论。 在文章的第四部分，为了避免传统罪数论的理论缺陷，本文采用竞合论的解释方法，去诠释财产毁损行为与财产犯罪的犯罪构成、罪名以及刑法规范之间的关系。依照竞合论原理，将财产毁损行为所引发的犯罪竞合问题分为假象竞合与真实竞合两部分。在假象竞合部分，分析并论述财产毁损行为所产生的法条竞合，以及共罚的事后毁损行为刑事责任的确定。在真实竞合部分，讨论与财产毁损行为相关的想象竞合、牵连关系以及实质竞合刑事责任确定等问题。
[Abstract]:In the property crime, the behavior of destroying property occurs from time to time, and its influence on the criminal law evaluation of every crime of property crime is self-evident. Although the criminal law of our country provides for the crime of intentionally destroying property, it obviously can not cover all the acts of damage in evaluating the crime of property, and at the same time, the theoretical circle also lacks the related systematization discussion. In view of this, this paper will make a systematic analysis and research on the damage behavior ignored by the legislation and the theory of criminal law, and explore the criminal law evaluation of each crime of property crime, that is, the influence on the conviction and sentencing. While combing the relevant theories of damage behavior, the qualitative problems of property crimes in special cases such as damage to property are also clarified. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the criminal law evaluation of the meaning of property damage. This paper combs the theories and debates about the purpose of illegal possession and determines the connotation of the meaning of property damage, that is, it is composed of intent of damage and intention of exclusion. According to the subjective intent of the perpetrator, the behavior of stealing other people's motor vehicle is analyzed qualitatively. The second part discusses the criminal law evaluation of property destruction. This paper enumerates and analyzes the previous arguments about the meaning of "damage", and puts forward the "original usages encroachment theory" based on the previous theories. For the special property, the damage definition of the special case provides the method of comparing and judging according to the value of the property itself and the economic price paid by restoring the original state of the property. The forms of physical, functional destruction, abandonment and concealment are analyzed. The third part of the article discusses the criminal law evaluation of the object of property damage. This paper lists three kinds of special behavior objects, such as animals, securities and contraband. Through demonstration and analysis, it is concluded that animals and qualification securities can be damaged, but stocks and contraband cannot be damaged. In the fourth part of the article, in order to avoid the theoretical defects of the traditional number theory of crime, this paper uses the explanation method of concurrence theory to explain the relationship between the crime of property damage and the crime of property crime, the charge and the norms of criminal law. According to the theory of concurrence, the problem of criminal concurrence caused by property damage is divided into two parts: false coincidence and real concurrence. In the part of false concurrence, the article analyzes and discusses the concurrence of laws arising from property damage, and the determination of criminal liability of afterwards damage behavior. In the part of real concurrence, this paper discusses some problems such as imaginative concurrence, implicating relation and criminal liability determination related to property damage behavior.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2291235
[Abstract]:In the property crime, the behavior of destroying property occurs from time to time, and its influence on the criminal law evaluation of every crime of property crime is self-evident. Although the criminal law of our country provides for the crime of intentionally destroying property, it obviously can not cover all the acts of damage in evaluating the crime of property, and at the same time, the theoretical circle also lacks the related systematization discussion. In view of this, this paper will make a systematic analysis and research on the damage behavior ignored by the legislation and the theory of criminal law, and explore the criminal law evaluation of each crime of property crime, that is, the influence on the conviction and sentencing. While combing the relevant theories of damage behavior, the qualitative problems of property crimes in special cases such as damage to property are also clarified. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the criminal law evaluation of the meaning of property damage. This paper combs the theories and debates about the purpose of illegal possession and determines the connotation of the meaning of property damage, that is, it is composed of intent of damage and intention of exclusion. According to the subjective intent of the perpetrator, the behavior of stealing other people's motor vehicle is analyzed qualitatively. The second part discusses the criminal law evaluation of property destruction. This paper enumerates and analyzes the previous arguments about the meaning of "damage", and puts forward the "original usages encroachment theory" based on the previous theories. For the special property, the damage definition of the special case provides the method of comparing and judging according to the value of the property itself and the economic price paid by restoring the original state of the property. The forms of physical, functional destruction, abandonment and concealment are analyzed. The third part of the article discusses the criminal law evaluation of the object of property damage. This paper lists three kinds of special behavior objects, such as animals, securities and contraband. Through demonstration and analysis, it is concluded that animals and qualification securities can be damaged, but stocks and contraband cannot be damaged. In the fourth part of the article, in order to avoid the theoretical defects of the traditional number theory of crime, this paper uses the explanation method of concurrence theory to explain the relationship between the crime of property damage and the crime of property crime, the charge and the norms of criminal law. According to the theory of concurrence, the problem of criminal concurrence caused by property damage is divided into two parts: false coincidence and real concurrence. In the part of false concurrence, the article analyzes and discusses the concurrence of laws arising from property damage, and the determination of criminal liability of afterwards damage behavior. In the part of real concurrence, this paper discusses some problems such as imaginative concurrence, implicating relation and criminal liability determination related to property damage behavior.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈洪兵;;论财产犯罪之间的界限与竞合[J];安徽大学法律评论;2010年01期
2 郭泽强,邵劭;对传统盗窃罪客体要件的追问[J];鄂州大学学报;2001年01期
3 张明楷;论财产罪的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2005年05期
4 桂亚胜;;论事后的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2012年04期
5 谭明;;论盗窃罪的不法领得意思——兼析盗窃罪与毁弃罪之法条关系[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2010年04期
6 黄国盛;;盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪的区别研究——兼论《关于审理盗窃案件具体运用法律若干问题的意见》第12条第4项的理解与适用[J];中国检察官;2010年24期
7 刘明祥;刑法中的非法占有目的[J];法学研究;2000年02期
8 陈洪兵;;认真评价本犯的事后行为[J];南京农业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
9 左袖阳;;盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪的区分[J];中国检察官;2013年02期
10 陈洪兵;;财产犯的排除意思与利用意思[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年03期
本文编号：2291235
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2291235.html
