刑法第383条第3款从宽处罚规定之研究

发布时间：2018-10-26 06:27

【摘要】：在高压反腐的政治背景下,正确理解和适用我国《刑法》第383条第3款,事关贪污犯罪人从宽处罚的刑事正义的科学实现。单独设置贪污罪的从宽规定,产生了适用上的困惑和理解上的争议,不利于有效惩治贪污犯罪。因此,有必要对该条文作进一步地探讨和研究。从建国至今,贪污罪从宽的条款经历了7 0多年的发展,《刑法修正案(九)》对贪污罪从宽的规定就是最新的立法增加。通过分析比较可知,贪污罪从宽处罚条款与《刑法》第36、37条中赔偿经济损失的规定是协调一致的,保持了立法的协调性。其中,贪污罪从宽条款设立是有理论根据的,如宪政的核心是保障犯罪人人权、宽严相济刑事政策对犯罪人的惩罚保持宽严适当的策略,以及刑法谦抑性强调的宽和与谦逊等,都为贪污罪从宽条款的设立提供了理论支撑。虽然贪污罪从宽规定有其合理性,但违反了《刑法》第67条坦白的规定,是分则突破总则的表现,而且该条款中的酌定情节法定化属于“立法特权”,也违反了刑法的平等性原则。最后,针对“真诚悔罪、积极退赃”的模糊性规定,应当进一步细化,提出了一些自己的理解,期望能达到更为明确的解释效果。
[Abstract]:Under the political background of high-pressure anti-corruption, the correct understanding and application of the third paragraph of Article 383 of the Criminal Law of our country is related to the scientific realization of criminal justice of lenient punishment of the embezzler. Setting the lenient stipulation of corruption crime alone leads to confusion in application and controversy in understanding, which is not conducive to the effective punishment of corruption crime. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore and study this article. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the provisions of leniency of the crime of corruption have been developed for more than 70 years. The provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) on leniency of the crime of corruption are the latest legislative increase. Through the analysis and comparison, it can be seen that the lenient punishment clause of corruption crime is in harmony with the provision of compensation for economic losses in Article 36 of the Criminal Law, and the coordination of legislation is maintained. Among them, the establishment of lenient clause of corruption crime is theoretically based, for example, the core of constitutionalism is to protect the human rights of the criminal, the policy of leniency and strictness of criminal policy to punish the offender, and the leniency and modesty emphasized by the criminal law, etc. Both of them provide theoretical support for the establishment of leniency clause of corruption crime. Although the lenient stipulation of the crime of corruption is reasonable, it violates the provisions of Article 67 of the Criminal Law and is the manifestation of breaking through the general provisions. Moreover, the legalization of the discretionary circumstances in this article belongs to the "legislative privilege". It also violates the principle of equality in criminal law. Finally, in view of the fuzziness stipulation of "sincere repentance, active return of spoils", it should be further refined, and put forward some own understanding, in the hope of achieving a more clear interpretation effect.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】