量刑说理:现实问题、逻辑进路与技术规制
发布时间：2018-11-08 12:26
【摘要】：量刑说理是指根据事实与法律对量刑进行学理分析与说明。我国刑事判决书在量刑时通常不说理或者说理粗疏化,其根源在于量刑说理难度大而法官说理能力相对不济与法官拥有广泛的自由裁量权。量刑说理应当以三段论为基础,根据不同的量刑规范命题的结构形式区别对待。量刑说理需要论证量刑结论具有较高的可接受性,符合语用逻辑,说理用语应具有契合性与情景感,并适当运用修辞与对话方法。量刑说理的技术规制措施有:将刑事判决书中的"量刑理由"改成"量刑说理";实行实质说理制度;明确量刑说理繁简分流的依据和标准;加强对量刑说理的审查和监督;构建量刑判例信息库。
[Abstract]:Sentencing reasoning refers to the theoretical analysis and explanation of sentencing according to facts and laws. The criminal judgment in our country is usually not reasonable or careless in sentencing, its root is that the reasoning of sentencing is difficult, the judge's reasoning ability is relatively poor and the judge has extensive discretion. Sentencing reasoning should be based on syllogism and be treated differently according to the structure of different sentencing norms. Sentencing reasoning needs to demonstrate that the conclusion of sentencing is more acceptable, in line with pragmatic logic, rational language should have a sense of fit and situational, and appropriate use of rhetoric and dialogue methods. The technical regulation measures of sentencing reasoning include: changing "sentencing reason" in criminal judgment to "sentencing reasoning"; implementing substantive reasoning system; clarifying the basis and standard of sentencing reasoning; strengthening the examination and supervision of sentencing reasoning; Construct the information base of sentencing case.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：2015年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“量刑双轨制研究”(15SFB2016)的阶段性成果 江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心研究成果
【分类号】：D924.13
本文编号：2318501
[Abstract]:Sentencing reasoning refers to the theoretical analysis and explanation of sentencing according to facts and laws. The criminal judgment in our country is usually not reasonable or careless in sentencing, its root is that the reasoning of sentencing is difficult, the judge's reasoning ability is relatively poor and the judge has extensive discretion. Sentencing reasoning should be based on syllogism and be treated differently according to the structure of different sentencing norms. Sentencing reasoning needs to demonstrate that the conclusion of sentencing is more acceptable, in line with pragmatic logic, rational language should have a sense of fit and situational, and appropriate use of rhetoric and dialogue methods. The technical regulation measures of sentencing reasoning include: changing "sentencing reason" in criminal judgment to "sentencing reasoning"; implementing substantive reasoning system; clarifying the basis and standard of sentencing reasoning; strengthening the examination and supervision of sentencing reasoning; Construct the information base of sentencing case.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：2015年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“量刑双轨制研究”(15SFB2016)的阶段性成果 江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心研究成果
【分类号】：D924.13
【相似文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王奥琪;挪用型犯罪量刑问题研究[D];黑龙江大学;2015年
，本文编号：2318501
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2318501.html
