监督过失理论在查办渎职犯罪中的司法运用
[Abstract]:The theory of supervisory negligence refers to the theory that the supervisor may be investigated for the responsibility of the supervisor because he is lazy to perform the duties of supervision and management, which leads to the harmful result caused by the supervised human misconduct. The theory originated in Japan in the fifties and sixties of the 20th century. In recent decades, it has provided theoretical support for solving the criminal responsibility of supervisors in various kinds of pollution incidents and accidents. Although the criminal code of our country does not explicitly stipulate the theory of supervision negligence, in judicial practice, most of the contents of relevant judicial interpretation and case law contain the idea of supervision negligence. The behavior pattern of supervising negligent crime is basically the same as that of part of dereliction of duty as stipulated in Chapter IX of Criminal Law of our country. However, the theory of supervisory negligence is more specific and direct than the theory used in the investigation of dereliction of duty in our country at present. The theory requires that the perpetrator should not only foresee his own behavior and the consequences caused by it. Moreover, the behavior and consequence of the supervised person should be foreseen, and the behavior of the supervisor should be included in the causative force of the harmful result. Therefore, if the theory of supervisory negligence is introduced into the investigation and handling of dereliction of duty, combining with the theory of constitution of crime, it can play a positive role in determining the criminal responsibility of dereliction of duty, especially the crime of negligent dereliction of duty. Will be conducive to further prevention and cracking down on dereliction of duty crime. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part, the overview of supervisory negligence theory. This part introduces in detail the origin and development of the supervisory negligence theory, the basic concept and the theoretical basis, and analyzes the reasons for the comprehensive application of the supervisory negligence theory in China. In the second part, the objective elements of dereliction of duty are determined from the perspective of supervisory negligence theory. On the basis of analyzing the behavior and causality of supervision negligence, this part puts forward the specific rules of determining the behavior and causality of malfeasance crime. The third part, the main elements of dereliction of duty from the perspective of supervisory negligence theory. This part combines the content of supervisory negligence theory to solve the problem that the subject of dereliction of duty is difficult to identify. The author puts forward that the subject of dereliction of duty should be determined by two positive aspects: "having supervisory qualification" and "having supervisory responsibility" and applying the principle of trust and the possibility of expectation properly. The fourth part, under the supervision negligence theory angle of view, the malfeasance crime subjective aspect confirmation. This part discusses the duty of care and the ability of care of the supervisor, and analyzes the influence on the responsibility of the supervisor under the circumstance of intentional misconduct of the supervised person.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕英杰;;监督过失的客观归责[J];清华法学;2008年04期
2 李蕤宏;;监督过失理论研究[J];刑事法评论;2008年02期
3 刘期湘;;监督过失的概念界定[J];文史博览(理论);2008年06期
4 杜焕新;;论监督过失中信赖原则的适用[J];法制与社会;2009年10期
5 陈国娟;;监督过失相关问题研究[J];法制与社会;2009年31期
6 王东明;杜辉;;监督过失与共同过失关系论[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年12期
7 王炳宽;;监督过失理论与对策研究[J];法制与社会;2012年29期
8 赵瑞罡,杨庆玖;监督过失论[J];政治与法律;2001年04期
9 彭凤莲;;监督过失责任论[J];法学家;2004年06期
10 王安异;;浅谈监督过失的注意义务[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 李文祥;;论外国刑法中的监督过失[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪外国刑事法律的理论与实践[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 高检院渎职侵权检察厅侦查指挥中心主任、全国检察业务专家 关福金;监督过失理论在渎职行为认定中的适用[N];检察日报;2009年
2 潘星丞 华南师范大学法学院;借鉴监督过失理论 加强食品安全监管者责任[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 肖冬梅;监督过失犯罪研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
2 高星;监督过失犯罪研究[D];大连海事大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈国娟;监督过失犯罪研究[D];山东大学;2010年
2 李清玉;监督过失犯罪研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
3 顾艳丽;监督过失基本问题研究[D];郑州大学;2009年
4 吴沛东;论渎职犯罪中监督过失的认定[D];四川师范大学;2015年
5 蒋红朴;监督过失理论在玩忽职守罪中的司法应用[D];西南政法大学;2014年
6 杨遇豪;监督过失责任的实践应用问题研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
7 郭瑞;监督过失理论在查办渎职犯罪中的司法运用[D];内蒙古大学;2016年
8 董芳;监督过失的刑事责任及主体的确定[D];中国政法大学;2009年
9 王会宾;监督过失成立犯罪研究[D];河北师范大学;2010年
10 胡丽曼;论医疗犯罪中的监督过失[D];湘潭大学;2009年
,本文编号:2328066
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2328066.html