网络帮助行为“正犯化”研究

发布时间：2018-11-15 15:25

【摘要】：目前,我国刑法学术界对网络帮助行为“正犯化”理论研究较少涉及,在刑法理论上和司法实践中都存在诸多问题。“正犯化”即对网络帮助行为的入罪评价不在传统共同犯罪的理论框架之下,而是予以独立的定罪量刑。在第一章笔者整理了我国刑事立法及司法解释中,典型的网络帮助行为“正犯化”罪名,简单予以界定了网络帮助行为“正犯化”。在第二章笔者分析了网络帮助行为“正犯化”的现实必要。首先以近期引发网络热议的快播案为例,分析网络帮助行为区别于传统帮助行为的新特质;其次从共同犯罪的主观犯意联络、客观行为协作和内部结构三个角度,看待共同犯罪的网络异化现象;最后说明传统共同犯罪理论难以合理评价、恰当规制网络帮助行为。在第三章笔者论证了网络帮助行为“正犯化的理论基础。回归到德日刑法理论的两种立法模式,在单一正犯体系下,只有正犯概念,共犯当作正犯予以评价;而在正犯/共犯分离体系下,限制的正犯概念存在不同标准来严格区分正犯与共犯,以实质标准区分是存在正犯化现象。关于帮助行为的违法性问题,在二元的行为无价值论的立场下,网络帮助行为具有相对独立的违法性(违法的相对性),是可以与正犯行为相分离进行独立评价的。另外,笔者就网络帮助行为“正犯化”违背共犯理论进行释疑。在第四章笔者探讨了网络帮助行为“正犯化”的司法认定上帮助犯和实行犯的关系与主观“明知”两个问题,并提出自己的看法。
[Abstract]:At present, the academic circles of criminal law in our country seldom study the theory of "principal offense" of network helping behavior, and there are many problems in the theory of criminal law and judicial practice. The "principal offender" is not under the traditional theory framework of joint crime, but the independent conviction and sentencing is not the theoretical framework of the traditional joint crime, that is to say, the evaluation of the incrimination of the network aiding behavior. In the first chapter, the author arranges the criminal legislation and the judicial explanation of our country, the typical network help behavior "the principal offense" the charge, has defined the network help behavior "the principal crime" simply. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the necessity of network help behavior. Firstly, this paper analyzes the new characteristics of the network help behavior which is different from the traditional help behavior. Secondly, from the three angles of subjective criminal intention connection, objective behavior cooperation and internal structure, this paper discusses the phenomenon of network alienation of joint crime. Finally, it explains that the traditional theory of joint crime is difficult to evaluate reasonably, and properly regulate the network help behavior. In the third chapter, the author demonstrates the theoretical basis of network help behavior. Returning to the two legislative models of criminal law theory of Germany and Japan, under the system of single principal offense, there is only the concept of principal offender, and the accomplice is evaluated as principal offender. In the system of separation of principal offender and accomplice, the concept of restricted principal offender has different standards to distinguish between principal offender and accomplice strictly. With regard to the illegality of aiding behavior, under the position of dualistic behavior without value, the network-aided behavior has relatively independent illegality (the relativity of illegality), which can be independently evaluated from the principal offender's behavior. In addition, the author of the network-assisted behavior of the "principal offense" against the theory of accomplice to explain. In the fourth chapter, the author discusses the relationship between the aiding crime and the practicing crime and the subjective "knowing" in the judicial cognizance of the "principal offense" of the network help behavior, and puts forward his own views.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】