量刑情节的禁止重复评价研究
发布时间：2018-11-22 10:27
【摘要】：禁止重复评价最朴素的价值理念是一事不再理。在国内,禁止重复评价作为一项原则,仍处于理论探讨阶段。立法中尚不能觅得其踪,司法实践中也处于摸索阶段。理论研究中,禁止重复评价适用范围比较宽泛,主要是用于禁止定罪事实之间重复评价、定罪事实与量刑事实之间重复评价。因种种原因,在具体探讨该原则时,学者倾向于从宏观层面把握,即使有对该原则进行具体分析的研究,大都局限于对想象竞合犯、累犯等不厌其烦地讨论。而单独针对量刑情节进行重复评价的研究鲜有报道。在量刑过程中,量刑情节的适用在很大程度上决定着行为人的刑期。受制于量刑情节本身的特质,在界定量刑情节、适用量刑情节的环节,都存在对交叉事实重复评价的可能性。本文通过对禁止重复评价进行简单梳理和概述,为量刑情节的禁止重复评价进行理论铺垫；通过梳理量刑情节与犯罪构成要件、定罪情节之间的关系,分析量刑情节识别环节的重复评价及如何禁止重复评价的处理建议；通过对各种量刑情节之间的关系结合案件具体分析,为量刑情节适用过程中重复评价的禁止提出处理办法。在此基础上,对禁止重复评价在我国立法中的法定化进行了展望。
[Abstract]:It is forbidden to repeat evaluation of the most simple value of the idea that one thing is no longer reasonable. In China, the prohibition of repeated evaluation as a principle is still in the theoretical stage. Legislation can not find its trace, judicial practice is also in the groping stage. In the theoretical research, the scope of prohibition of repeated evaluation is relatively broad, mainly used to prohibit the repeated evaluation between the facts of conviction and sentencing. For a variety of reasons, scholars tend to grasp the principle from the macro level, even if there is a specific analysis of the principle, mostly confined to the imaginative co-offender, recidivism and so on. However, there are few reports on repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances alone. In the process of sentencing, the application of sentencing circumstances to a large extent determines the perpetrator's sentence. Subject to the characteristics of the circumstances of sentencing, in defining the circumstances of sentencing, applicable to the circumstances of sentencing, there is the possibility of repeated evaluation of cross-facts. In this paper, the prohibition of repeated evaluation is simply combed and summarized to pave the way for the prohibition of repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances. Through combing the relationship between the circumstances of sentencing and the elements of the crime, the relationship between the circumstances of conviction, the repeated evaluation of the identification of the circumstances of sentencing and the suggestions on how to prohibit the repeated evaluation are analyzed. Based on the analysis of the relationship between various circumstances of sentencing and the specific case analysis, this paper puts forward a method to deal with the prohibition of repeated evaluation in the course of the application of circumstances of sentencing. On the basis of this, the legalization of the prohibition of repeated evaluation in Chinese legislation is prospected.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2349033
[Abstract]:It is forbidden to repeat evaluation of the most simple value of the idea that one thing is no longer reasonable. In China, the prohibition of repeated evaluation as a principle is still in the theoretical stage. Legislation can not find its trace, judicial practice is also in the groping stage. In the theoretical research, the scope of prohibition of repeated evaluation is relatively broad, mainly used to prohibit the repeated evaluation between the facts of conviction and sentencing. For a variety of reasons, scholars tend to grasp the principle from the macro level, even if there is a specific analysis of the principle, mostly confined to the imaginative co-offender, recidivism and so on. However, there are few reports on repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances alone. In the process of sentencing, the application of sentencing circumstances to a large extent determines the perpetrator's sentence. Subject to the characteristics of the circumstances of sentencing, in defining the circumstances of sentencing, applicable to the circumstances of sentencing, there is the possibility of repeated evaluation of cross-facts. In this paper, the prohibition of repeated evaluation is simply combed and summarized to pave the way for the prohibition of repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances. Through combing the relationship between the circumstances of sentencing and the elements of the crime, the relationship between the circumstances of conviction, the repeated evaluation of the identification of the circumstances of sentencing and the suggestions on how to prohibit the repeated evaluation are analyzed. Based on the analysis of the relationship between various circumstances of sentencing and the specific case analysis, this paper puts forward a method to deal with the prohibition of repeated evaluation in the course of the application of circumstances of sentencing. On the basis of this, the legalization of the prohibition of repeated evaluation in Chinese legislation is prospected.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D914
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 石经海;;量刑思维规律下的量刑方法构建[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年02期
2 周光权;;量刑程序改革的实体法支撑[J];法学家;2010年02期
3 张勇;;量刑规范化改革及路径选择[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2008年01期
4 李凯;侯洁;;论量刑情节的冲突及其处理[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年03期
5 郭开元;;禁止重复评价原则视域中的想象竞合犯[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2007年02期
6 刘为军,郭泽强;禁止重复评价原则研究[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2003年02期
7 周光权;;论禁止重复评价——以刑满后发现同种余罪的处理为切入点[J];人民检察;2012年09期
8 石经海;;“量刑规范化”解读[J];现代法学;2009年03期
9 姜涛;;论量刑中的禁止双重评价原则及其实现[J];中共中央党校学报;2011年03期
10 张向东;;从量刑基准到基准刑:量刑方法的革新[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李继红;量刑基准问题研究[D];兰州大学;2013年
，本文编号：2349033
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2349033.html
