寻衅滋事罪司法认定问题研究

发布时间：2018-11-23 18:52

【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪来源于我国1979年《刑法》第160条规定的流氓罪,正式以“寻衅滋事罪”的名称出现在1997年修订后的《刑法》第293条中。笔者之所以选择该选题,有以下三个原因:其一,在日常生活中,寻衅滋事行为经常发生;其二,由于寻衅滋事罪的“随意殴打他人”、“强拿硬要公私财物”、“任意损毁公私财物”行为与故意伤害罪的“伤害他人”行为、抢劫罪的“抢夺他人财物”行为、故意毁坏财物罪的“毁坏财物”行为十分相似;其三,另外法律对寻衅滋事罪规定的过于抽象,像“随意”“情节恶劣”“情节严重”等词都没有具体的规定,给予法官很大的自由裁量权,导致司法实践中法官对这些罪名难以准确把握,争议较大,出现重罪轻判、轻罪重判的情形。2013年7月22日,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院针对寻衅滋事罪颁布《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,将“随意”、“情节恶劣”、“情节严重”一词具体化,这才使寻衅滋事罪逐步完善。本文笔者结合刑事司法实践中三个案例,总结寻衅滋事罪在司法适用过程中存在的问题,并找出完善寻衅滋事罪司法适用困境的办法。本文由三个部分组成,分别是:第一章主要是简述笔者选取的三个典型案例的基本案情、判决结果、案件的争议焦点以及由该争议焦点所引发的问题,这是案例分析不可缺少的部分。第二章主要是对案件问题进行法理分析,包括对寻衅滋事致人重伤、死亡如何定罪问题的分析、随意殴打型寻衅滋事罪与故意伤害罪界限的分析、强拿硬要型寻衅滋事罪与抢劫罪的界限分析、任意损毁型寻衅滋事罪与故意毁坏财物罪界限的分析。对这些问题的分析必定少不了对寻衅滋事罪的犯罪构成要件的分析,包括对寻衅滋事罪的罪过形式以及主观动机的分析、寻衅滋事罪侵犯法益的分析及寻衅滋事罪的行为特征的分析;最后对每个案件作出评析。第三章主要是在案例分析的基础上,结合每个案件引出的问题总结出寻衅滋事罪在司法实践中的困境,并提出“完善立法及完善配套的司法解释”的建议,完善寻衅滋事罪司法认定问题。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking trouble originates from the crime of hooliganism stipulated in Article 160 of the 1979 Criminal Law of our country. It formally appears in Article 293 of the Criminal Law revised in 1997 under the name of "the crime of seeking trouble and causing trouble". The author chose this topic for the following three reasons: first, in daily life, provocative behavior often occurs; Second, due to the "arbitrary beating" of others, the "compulsion to insist on public and private property", the "arbitrary destruction of public and private property" and the act of "harming others" in the crime of intentional injury, and the act of "snatching other people's property" in the crime of robbery, The behavior of "destroying property" in the crime of intentionally destroying property is very similar; Third, in addition, the law is too abstract for the crime of provoking trouble, such as the words "arbitrary", "aggravated" and "serious", which do not contain any specific provisions, and give the judge a great deal of discretion. As a result of judicial practice, it is difficult for judges to accurately grasp these charges, and they are in great dispute, resulting in serious felonies and heavy sentences for misdemeanours. On July 22, 2013, the Supreme people's Court, The Supreme people's Procuratorate promulgated the explanation on certain issues of the applicable Law in handling the Criminal case of provoking and causing trouble in the light of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, which concretized the terms "arbitrary", "aggravated" and "serious". Only in this way can the crime of provoking trouble be gradually perfected. Combined with three cases in criminal judicial practice, the author summarizes the problems existing in the judicial application of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, and finds out the methods to perfect the dilemma of judicial application of the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble. This paper is composed of three parts: the first chapter mainly describes the basic facts of the three typical cases selected by the author, the judgment results, the dispute focus of the case and the problems caused by the dispute focus. This is an indispensable part of the case study. The second chapter is mainly about the legal analysis of the case, including the analysis of how to convict serious injury, how to convict death, the analysis of the boundary between the crime of random beatings and the crime of intentional injury. The analysis of the boundary between the crime of aggressive provocation and robbery, the crime of arbitrary damage and disturbance and the crime of intentionally destroying property. An analysis of these issues is bound to involve an analysis of the elements of the crime of provocation, including the forms of guilt and subjective motives of the crime of provocation, The analysis of the crime of provoking and causing trouble and the analysis of the characteristics of the behavior of the crime of provoking and causing trouble; Finally, the evaluation of each case is made. The third chapter is mainly on the basis of case analysis, combined with the problems arising from each case, summed up the plight of the crime of causing trouble in the judicial practice, and put forward the suggestion of "perfecting the legislation and perfecting the supporting judicial interpretation". Improve the problem of judicial cognizance of the crime of seeking quarrels and causing trouble.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5

【相似文献】