延边国贸非法吸收公众存款案分析报告

发布时间：2018-12-11 00:05

【摘要】：有研究表明我国企业总数30%的国企获得70%银行贷款,这也促使了民间借贷的实际发展。民间借贷在满足中小民营企业的资金需求上确实起到了相当的作用,但随着这种资金往来逐渐繁荣,也促使了相关的经济犯罪案件数量大幅增加。2015年最高法院的工作报告显示,全国法院新收集资诈骗罪案件同比上升48.83%,而非法吸收公众存款罪案件同比上升127.38%。应用法学严厉的刑罚带来的实践效果却并不尽如人意,非法集资类案件依然层出不穷,且犯罪规模、数额等日渐扩大。而实践中如此严厉的惩处,本罪也被理论法学界一些学者诟病为口袋条款。本文将以延边国贸非法吸收公众存款案为研究起点,通过详细分析本罪的构成犯罪的各个要件,结合本案的判决和实际的案情分析,探寻、研究司法实践中认定本罪的焦点:"社会公众"、"向社会公开宣传"、"扰乱金融秩序"等问题。本罪法益为金融机构存贷款管理秩序,而内在隐含就是以货币为载体的国家信用,银行正是此金融管理秩序信用的具体实施者,正是由于银行间接融资的职能对于国民经济的巨大影响,才需要对于本罪法益进行最为严苛刑法规制的保护。结合延边国贸案认定本罪的典型性,以寻求分析本罪的法益,即社会危害性具体如何。通过案件促进对理论的认识,从法理学、解释学的角度对本罪的深入分析,解释其犯罪的构成,从而厘清其法条中各个概念,提出指导认定本案的可行性建议。重新思考延边国贸案件判决的合理性,结合对本罪的法益的理解,以理论指导实践中的司法认定,期以有类似案件的普遍指导意义。本文主要分四章,第一章首先介绍研究方向的目的、意义以及研究方法。第二章介绍非法吸收公众存款罪的法规条文及司法解释;延边国贸案件的基本信息和案情,通过对本案的审讯笔录和判决书等资料的研究,比对法庭中的控辩双方的观点和理由,总结案件焦点。第三章对于案件问题在理论上予以阐释,比较本罪的客观、主观要件与本罪规定之法益的异同,系统分析本罪社会危害性。依据法益分析本罪,对相关概念进一步释义,运用刑法的相关理论结合延边国贸案的具体情况,详细分析、厘定延边国贸案认定本罪的要素。考量本案具体情节,运用理论结合实践的方法,思考本案判决的其它可能性,本罪在现行刑法体系的现实意义,结合延边国贸案的实际案情,本文认为被告辩称无罪的理由不能成立,但由于新司法解释的颁布,或许有适用减轻情形的可能。第四章通过本案的警示作用,以融资刑法规避为视角,提出相应的融资建议。
[Abstract]:Some studies show that 30% of the total number of enterprises in our country get 70% of bank loans, which also promotes the development of private lending. Private lending has indeed played a significant role in meeting the capital needs of small and medium-sized private enterprises, but as this kind of capital flow has gradually flourished, The report of the Supreme Court in 2015 showed that the number of new cases of fraud collected by the national courts increased 48.83 percent from a year earlier, while the number of cases of illegal taking in public deposits rose 127.38 percent from the same period last year. The practice effect brought by the severe punishment of law is not satisfactory, the illegal fund-raising cases still emerge in endlessly, and the scale and amount of the crime are expanding day by day. In practice, this crime has been criticized as pocket clause by some scholars in the field of theory and law. This article will take the Yanbian International Trade illegal absorption public deposit case as the research starting point, through the detailed analysis this crime constitutes the crime each element, unifies the case judgment and the actual case analysis, explores, This paper studies the focus of this crime in judicial practice: "the public", "publicity to the public", "disturbing the financial order" and so on. The legal interest of this crime is the order of deposit and loan management of financial institutions, and the inherent implication is the state credit with currency as the carrier, and the bank is the concrete executor of the credit of this financial management order. It is because the function of indirect financing of banks has a great impact on the national economy that it is necessary to protect the legal interests of this crime with the strictest criminal law regulation. Combined with Yanbian International Trade case to identify the typical nature of this crime in order to seek to analyze the legal interests of this crime, that is, the specific harm to society. Through the case to promote the understanding of theory, from the perspective of jurisprudence, hermeneutics of the in-depth analysis of the crime, explain the composition of its crime, so as to clarify the various concepts in its law, and put forward feasible suggestions to guide and identify this case. Rethinking the rationality of the judgment of Yanbian International Trade case, combining with the understanding of the legal interests of this crime, using theory to guide the judicial determination in practice, there is a general guiding significance of similar cases. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the purpose, significance and research methods of the research direction. The second chapter introduces the legal provisions and judicial interpretation of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public. The basic information and case of Yanbian International Trade case, through the study of the trial record and judgment of this case, compare the views and reasons of the prosecution and the defense in the court, and summarize the focus of the case. The third chapter explains the case in theory, compares the objective of the crime, the subjective elements and the legal benefits of this crime, and systematically analyzes the social harmfulness of the crime. According to the analysis of legal interests of this crime, further interpretation of the relevant concepts, the use of the relevant theory of criminal law combined with the specific circumstances of Yanbian International Trade case, detailed analysis, determine the Yanbian International Trade case to determine the elements of this crime. Considering the specific circumstances of the case, using the method of combining theory with practice, thinking about the other possibilities of the judgment of this case, the practical significance of this crime in the current criminal law system, and combining the actual case of the Yanbian International Trade case, This paper holds that the defendant's argument of innocence cannot be established, but with the promulgation of the new judicial interpretation, it may be possible to apply the mitigating circumstances. Chapter four, through the warning function of this case, puts forward the corresponding financing suggestions from the angle of financing criminal law evasion.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】