刑法立法解释之反思

发布时间：2018-12-16 05:15

【摘要】：成文法体系具有相对稳定性的同时,也具有一定的滞后性,势必要求立法者应适时根据我国社会发展变化的情况和打击犯罪的需要,对刑法进行必要的修改与补充,此也是完善我国刑法的需要。最高立法机关的法律及其相关解释的出现,反应了刑法在司法实践适用过程中存在的诸多问题以及司法实践对相关解释的需求。刑法的立法解释合理性问题一直是理论界争议的焦点,在论证过程中,应站在解释学与实证主义的立场上,从以下三个方面加以细化。一是通过对刑法立法现状的统计进而对刑法立法解释进行实证分析;二是从立法规定入手去探寻刑法立法解释存在的合理性,这种方法是目前理论界所缺乏的,其好处在于不会使司法实务与理论研究相脱节;三是提出刑法立法解释制度困境的解决途径,包括转变刑法立法解释的研究立场、对刑法立法解释权进行适当限制并且要缓解立法解释制度的体系性压力。通过这三方面的简要论证,以期能够理清立法解释的合理化脉络,更好地适用于刑事立法的司法实践过程中。
[Abstract]:At the same time, the system of statutory law is relatively stable, and also has a certain lag. It is bound to require legislators to make necessary amendments and supplements to the criminal law according to the situation of social development and changes in our country and the need to crack down on crime. This is also the need to improve our criminal law. The emergence of the law of the supreme legislature and its related interpretations reflect the problems existing in the application of criminal law in judicial practice and the demand of judicial practice for the relevant interpretation. The rationality of the legislative interpretation of criminal law has always been the focus of controversy in the theoretical circle. In the process of argumentation, it should be refined from the following three aspects from the standpoint of hermeneutics and positivism. First, through the statistics of the current situation of criminal law legislation and then the interpretation of criminal law legislation for empirical analysis; The second is to explore the rationality of the existence of the criminal law legislative interpretation from the legislative provisions. This method is lacking in the theoretical circle at present, and its advantage is that it will not disconnect the judicial practice from the theoretical research. The third is to put forward the solution to the predicament of the criminal law legislative interpretation system, including changing the research position of the criminal law legislative interpretation, appropriately restricting the criminal law legislative interpretation power and relieving the systematic pressure of the legislative interpretation system. Through the brief argumentation of these three aspects, the author hopes to clarify the rational context of legislative interpretation and better apply it to the judicial practice of criminal legislation.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨金融学院法律系;
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】