结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争的中国展开

发布时间：2018-12-21 10:56

【摘要】：我国刑法学中结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争的兴起,以四要件论与阶层论之争相伴随而发生的知识论转型为基本背景。在犯罪论体系问题上取得的理论共识,构成催生结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争的土壤。结果无价值论与行为无价值论这对范畴在意义上具有双重性,它并不严格对应于客观不法论与主观不法论;结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争,属于行为刑法意义上的刑法客观主义内部的争论。与德日刑法学中的结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争相比,我国的结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争有一些自身的特点。我国的行为无价值论者对"规范"概念的界定存在多变的现象,由此导致理论内容的不断变动。雅各布斯的规范论具有超出行为无价值论范畴的意涵,有必要将之跟结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争相剥离。
[Abstract]:The rise of the controversy between the theory of resultant non-value and the theory of behavioral non-axiology in criminal jurisprudence in China is based on the transformation of knowledge theory which is accompanied by the theory of four elements and the theory of stratum. The theoretical consensus on the system of crime theory forms the soil for the controversy between the theory of result and the theory of behavior without value. Results the theory of non-value and the theory of non-axiology of behavior have duality to the category, which is not strictly corresponding to the theory of objective illegality and the theory of subjective illegality. Results the controversy between the theory of no value and the theory of behavior is an internal argument of objectivism in criminal law. Compared with the argument between the theory of result without value and the theory of behavior without value in German and Japanese criminal law, the argument between the theory of result without value and the theory of behavior without value has its own characteristics. In our country, the definition of "norm" by the non-value theorists has a changeable phenomenon, which leads to the constant change of the theoretical content. Jacobs' gauge theory has the meaning beyond the category of behavioral non-value theory, and it is necessary to separate it from the result non-value theory and the behavior non-value theory.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：日本名城大学研究经费的资助
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】