私力救济的范围及限度研究

发布时间：2018-12-31 14:24

【摘要】：在矛盾冲突日趋多样化的现代法治社会，私力救济在纠纷解决中依旧扮演着重要角色，补充着公力救济的不足。私力救济与公力救济一样都需要法律来加以规范。本文全文大约三万字左右，总共分为四章，从范围和限度出发，对私力救济进行了深入的研究，提出了一些规范私力救济行为的建议。第一章，以一系列非法维权案例引出私力救济的话题，指出私力救济是需要加以规范的救济方式。然后从私力救济的概念及特征入手，论及私力救济的价值及缺陷，指出以法律来规范私力救济的必要性。第二章，从不同的角度出发研究私力救济的范围。首先，从历史发展的角度，考察不同时期对私力救济的态度，然后从横向的各国法律出发来论述各国对于私力救济范围的规定。研究我国法律中私力救济的范围时，以部门法为视角，，在整个法律体系内进行，而不是仅仅局限于民商法领域。这样以比较研究的方法，全面呈现出，与域外法律相比之下，我国法律对私力救济范围的过度限制。第三章，继续以比较研究的方法，并且结合了相关判例，介绍了大陆法系和英美法系国家关于私力救济限度的不同规定，以及各自的判断标准，与我国法律的相关规定进行对比，指出我国关于私力救济限度的法律规定存在不完善之处，即对限度的规定十分模糊，不易判断。第四章，在前面几章的论述后，借鉴各国对私力救济范围及限度的规定，以及相关案例，提出构建私力救济法律控制体系的构想，围绕私力救济的范围及限度相关规定的完善，以及对几种典型的私力救济行为的具体规范，建立一个完整的私力救济制度，从而构建出包含私力救济、公力救济以及社会救济的多元化纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:In the modern legal society where contradictions and conflicts are becoming more and more diverse, private relief still plays an important role in dispute resolution and complements the deficiency of public remedy. Private relief, like public relief, needs to be regulated by law. This paper consists of about 30,000 words, which is divided into four chapters. Based on the scope and limitation, this paper makes a deep study on the private relief, and puts forward some suggestions for regulating the private relief behavior. In the first chapter, a series of cases of illegal rights protection lead to the topic of private relief, pointing out that private relief is a remedy that needs to be standardized. Then from the concept and characteristics of private relief, the paper discusses the value and defects of private relief, and points out the necessity of regulating private relief by law. The second chapter studies the scope of private relief from different angles. First of all, from the perspective of historical development, this paper examines the attitude towards private relief in different periods, and then discusses the scope of private relief in different countries from the perspective of horizontal national laws. When studying the scope of private relief in Chinese law, it is carried out in the whole legal system from the angle of department law, not confined to the field of civil and commercial law. In this way, compared with the foreign laws, the scope of private relief is restricted by the law of our country. The third chapter, with the method of comparative study, and combined with the relevant jurisprudence, introduces the different provisions of the private relief limits and their respective judgment standards in the countries of civil law system and common law system. Comparing with the relevant provisions of Chinese law, the author points out that there are some imperfections in the legal provisions on the limits of private relief in our country, that is, the provisions of the limits are very vague and difficult to judge. The fourth chapter, after the discussion in the preceding chapters, draws lessons from the various countries to the private relief scope and the limit stipulation, as well as the correlation case, proposed the construction private power relief legal control system idea, revolves the private power relief scope and the limit correlation stipulation consummation, And to several typical private relief behavior concrete standard, establishes a complete private power relief system, thus constructs the diversification dispute settlement mechanism which includes the private power relief, the public power relief and the social relief.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923;D924

【参考文献】